These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1789763)
1. Valiant-PhD and Lojic N amalgam alloys: four-year clinical results. Smales RJ; Rupinskas L Aust Dent J; 1991 Aug; 36(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 1789763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical behaviour over three years of GS-80 and Lojic+ amalgam alloys. Smales RJ; Gerke DC Aust Dent J; 1994 Dec; 39(6):344-7. PubMed ID: 7832680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of polishing on the marginal integrity of amalgam restorations. Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 6585528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical behaviour of high-copper amalgams with time, site, size and class of cavity preparation. Smales RJ; Gerke DC; Hume WR J Dent; 1990 Feb; 18(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2312889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gallium alloy restorations in primary teeth: a 12-month study. Kaga M; Nakajima H; Sakai T; Oguchi H J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1195-200. PubMed ID: 8803395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The finishing and early marginal fracture of clinical amalgam restorations. Bryant RW; Collins CJ J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 2768622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study). Kamel FM Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy. Kiremitci A; Bolay S J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):664-7. PubMed ID: 12787466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study. Svanberg M Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of lining materials on shear bond strength of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations. Ng BP; Purton DG; Hood JA Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 9656921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations. Mahler DB; Engle JH J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jan; 131(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10649871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]