138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17897647)
1. Comparison of depth of necrosis achieved by CO2- and N2O-cryotherapy.
Mariategui J; Santos C; Taxa L; Jeronimo J; Castle PE
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 100(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 17897647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of depth of necrosis using cryotherapy by gas and number of freeze cycles.
Cremer M; Ditzian L; Winkler JL; Jerónimo J; Singleton J; Franco HV; Maza M; Conlisk E; Gage J; Castle P; Santos C
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Jan; 19(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24886871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cryotherapy in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in developing countries.
Adewole IF; Babarinsa IA; Odeniyi GD
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Jan; 60(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 9506421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of cough technique and cryogen gas on temperatures achieved during simulated cryotherapy.
Seamans Y; Loesel C; Jeronimo J; Sellors J; Castle PE
BMC Womens Health; 2007 Oct; 7():16. PubMed ID: 17908317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lack of effectiveness of CO2 cryotherapy for treatment of CIN.
Santos CL; Torres J; Sanchez J; Dasgupta A; Jeronimo J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 Oct; 87(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 15464779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Time Intervals Between Prior Cervical Conization and Posterior Hysterectomy Influence Postoperative Infection in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Cancer.
Yin X; Zhu L; Tan W; Zhu X; Liu S; Xu W
Med Sci Monit; 2018 Dec; 24():9063-9072. PubMed ID: 30547901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Non-Gas-Based Cryotherapy System for the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Mixed-Methods Approach for Initial Development and Testing.
Cremer M; Paul P; Bergman K; Haas M; Maza M; Zevallos A; Ossandon M; Garai JD; Winkler JL
Glob Health Sci Pract; 2017 Mar; 5(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 28351879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia positive cutting edge after conization].
Dai ZQ; Pan LY; Huang HF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 29(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 17645859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cryotherapy of the cervix.
Hurt WG
J Fam Pract; 1979 Jul; 9(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 448310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Good things still come in old packages: cryosurgery vs LEEP. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Pfenninger JL
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1999; 12(5):416-8. PubMed ID: 10534094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cryotherapy of the uterine cervix.
Mayeaux EJ; Spigener SD; German JA
J Fam Pract; 1998 Aug; 47(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9722795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of cryotherapy devices using nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide.
Winkler JL; Jeronimo J; Singleton J; Janmohamed A; Santos C
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Oct; 111(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 20580000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thermo-coagulation versus cryotherapy for treatment of cervical precancers: A prospective analytical study in a low-resource African setting.
Chigbu CO; Onwudiwe EN; Onyebuchi AK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Jan; 46(1):147-152. PubMed ID: 31595603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experience using cryotherapy for treatment of cervical precancerous lesions in low-resource settings.
Jacob M; Broekhuizen FF; Castro W; Sellors J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 May; 89 Suppl 2():S13-20. PubMed ID: 15823262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D ultrasound as a surgical quality control of conization in patients with severe dysplasia: a prospective study.
Dückelmann AM; Wordell J; Richter R; Sehouli J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Nov; 302(5):1189-1196. PubMed ID: 32740870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Controversy on another possible risk of preterm delivery after cervical conization: time interval between conization and conception.
Matsubara S; Usui R; Ohkuchi A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(1):5; discussion 6. PubMed ID: 24654451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of two alternative ablation treatments for cervical pre-cancer against standard gas-based cryotherapy: a randomized non-inferiority study.
Cremer M; Alfaro K; Garai J; Salinas M; Maza M; Zevallos A; Taxa L; Diaz AC; Castle P; Alonzo TA; Masch R; Soler M; Conzuelo-Rodriguez G; Gage JC; Felix JC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 May; ():. PubMed ID: 31055452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytology versus visual inspection with acetic acid among women treated previously with cryotherapy in a low-resource setting.
Cremer M; Bullard K; Maza M; Peralta E; Moore E; Garcia L; Masch R; Lerner V; Alonzo TA; Felix J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Dec; 111(3):249-52. PubMed ID: 20801447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Large loop excision and cold coagulation for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allam M; Paterson A; Thomson A; Ray B; Rajagopalan C; Sarkar G
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Jan; 88(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15617703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment of cervical precancers: back to basics.
Khan MJ; Smith-McCune KK
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1339-1343. PubMed ID: 24807323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
