These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17897816)

  • 1. Female mating preference for own males on species and population level in Chromaphyosemion killifishes (Cyprinodontiformes, Nothobranchiidae).
    Kullmann H; Klemme B
    Zoology (Jena); 2007; 110(5):377-86. PubMed ID: 17897816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.
    Peterson MA; Honchak BM; Locke SE; Beeman TE; Mendoza J; Green J; Buckingham KJ; White MA; Monsen KJ
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2639-55. PubMed ID: 16526511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of a parasitic nematode on male mate choice in a livebearing fish with a coercive mating system (western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis).
    Deaton R
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18765273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Karyotype differentiation in Chromaphyosemion killifishes (Cyprinodontiformes, Nothobranchiidae). III: extensive karyotypic variability associated with low mitochondrial haplotype differentiation in C. bivittatum.
    Volker M; Sonnenberg R; Ráb P; Kullmann H
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2007; 116(1-2):116-26. PubMed ID: 17268189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition.
    Johnstone RA
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6502):172-5. PubMed ID: 7969449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hybrid origin of a swordtail species (Teleostei: Xiphophorus clemenciae) driven by sexual selection.
    Meyer A; Salzburger W; Schartl M
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Mar; 15(3):721-30. PubMed ID: 16499697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species.
    Higgie M; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 May; 62(5):1192-203. PubMed ID: 18298640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of pre- and post-zygotic mating barriers, hybrid fitness and phylogenetic relationship between Cyprinodon variegatus variegatus and Cyprinodon variegatus hubbsi (Cyprinodontiformes, Teleostei).
    Brix KV; Grosell M
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):854-66. PubMed ID: 23480788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mating advantage of rare males in models of sexual selection.
    O'Donald P
    Nature; 1977 May; 267(5607):151-4. PubMed ID: 16073426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits.
    Doebeli M
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1587-600. PubMed ID: 16313470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex differences in the influence of mothers on the sociosexual preferences of their offspring.
    Kendrick KM; Haupt MA; Hinton MR; Broad KD; Skinner JD
    Horm Behav; 2001 Sep; 40(2):322-38. PubMed ID: 11534995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Male and female preference for conspecifics in a fish with male parental care (Percidae: Catonotus).
    O'Rourke CF; Mendelson TC
    Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 20637844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Rodríguez RL; Sullivan LE; Cocroft RB
    Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):571-8. PubMed ID: 15119440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patterns of speciation in endemic Mexican Goodeid fish: sexual conflict or early radiation?
    Ritchie MG; Webb SA; Graves JA; Magurran AE; Macias Garcia C
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):922-9. PubMed ID: 16033564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can the limited marsupium space be a limiting factor for Syngnathus abaster females? Insights from a population with size-assortative mating.
    Silva K; Vieira MN; Almada VC; Monteiro NM
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Mar; 77(2):390-4. PubMed ID: 18194263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.