147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17898447)
1. Multicriteria evaluation tools to support the conceptual design of activated sludge systems.
Flores X; Bonmatí A; Poch M; Roda IR; Jiménez L; Bañares-Alcántara R
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):85-94. PubMed ID: 17898447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision support systems in water and wastewater treatment process selection and design: a review.
Hamouda MA; Anderson WB; Huck PM
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(7):1757-70. PubMed ID: 19809138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of mathematical tools to improve the design and operation of activated sludge plants. Case study: the new WWTP of Galindo-Bilbao. Part I: Optimum design.
Rivas A; Ayesa E; Galarza A; Salterain A
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):157-65. PubMed ID: 11385842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multi-criteria evaluation of organic amendments used to transform an unproductive shrubland into a Mediterranean dehesa.
Tarrasón D; Ortiz O; Alcañiz JM
J Environ Manage; 2007 Mar; 82(4):446-56. PubMed ID: 16549231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A knowledge management methodology for the integrated assessment of WWTP configurations during conceptual design.
Garrido-Baserba M; Reif R; Rodriguez-Roda I; Poch M
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 22678214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of mathematical tools to improve the design and operation of activated sludge plants. Case study: the new WWTP of Galindo-Bilbao. Part II: Operational strategies and automatic controllers.
Galarza A; Ayesa E; Linaza MT; Rivas A; Salterain A
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):167-74. PubMed ID: 11385843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of multivariable statistical techniques in plant-wide WWTP control strategies analysis.
Flores X; Comas J; Roda IR; Jiménez L; Gernaey KV
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):75-83. PubMed ID: 17898446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies.
Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Nopens I; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):67-78. PubMed ID: 17978434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interaction between control and design of a SHARON reactor: economic considerations in a plant-wide (BSM2) context.
Volcke EI; van Loosdrecht MC; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(9):117-25. PubMed ID: 18025739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aspects of decision support in water management--example Berlin and Potsdam (Germany) II--improvement of management strategies.
Simon U; Brüggemann R; Pudenz S
Water Res; 2004 Nov; 38(19):4085-92. PubMed ID: 15491656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impacts of a participatory approach to assess sustainable sewage treatment technologies for urban fringe of Surat city in India.
Vashi AN; Shah NC
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(12):1957-62. PubMed ID: 18587184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualitative representation of trends: an alternative approach to process diagnosis and control.
Villez K; Vanrolleghem PA; Rosén C; Anctil F; Vanrolleghem PA; Duchesne C
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1525-32. PubMed ID: 18520008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parameter subset selection for the dynamic calibration of activated sludge models (ASMs): experience versus systems analysis.
Ruano MV; Ribes J; De Pauw DJ; Sin G
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):107-15. PubMed ID: 17978438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis and evaluation of methodologies to assess technical urban water systems.
Starkl M; Brunner N; Grasser U; Moog O; Stagl S; Kärrman E; Wimmer J; Szewieczek R; Haberl R
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(9):43-51. PubMed ID: 16445172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicriteria decision approaches to support sustainable drainage options for the treatment of highway and urban runoff.
Ellis JB; Deutsch JC; Mouchel JM; Scholes L; Revitt MD
Sci Total Environ; 2004 Dec; 334-335():251-60. PubMed ID: 15504512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A mathematical model for the flotation of waste activated sludge.
Fujisaki K; El-Zahar M
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(11-12):203-8. PubMed ID: 12523755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of surrogate modelling for multiobjective optimisation of urban wastewater systems.
Fu G; Khu ST; Butler D
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1641-7. PubMed ID: 19759467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A critical comparison of systematic calibration protocols for activated sludge models: a SWOT analysis.
Sin G; Van Hulle SW; De Pauw DJ; van Griensven A; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Res; 2005 Jul; 39(12):2459-74. PubMed ID: 15993465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Data-based modelling and proportional-integral-plus (pip) control of nitrate in an activated sludge benchmark.
Ghavipanjeh F; Taylor CJ; Young PC; Chotai A
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 11496682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
