434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17898449)
1. Design and performance of BNR activated sludge systems with flat sheet membranes for solid-liquid separation.
du Toit GJ; Ramphao MC; Parco V; Wentzel MC; Ekama GA
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):105-13. PubMed ID: 17898449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of membrane solid-liquid separation on design of biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems.
Ramphao M; Wentzel MC; Merritt R; Ekama GA; Young T; Buckley CA
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Mar; 89(6):630-46. PubMed ID: 15696540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in UCT-type MBR process.
Lee H; Han J; Yun Z
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19494447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biological nutrient removal in membrane bioreactors: denitrification and phosphorus removal kinetics.
Parco V; du Toit G; Wentzel M; Ekama G
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):125-34. PubMed ID: 17898451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of aerobic and anoxic phosphorus uptake in NDBEPR systems (UCT and ENBNRAS).
Vermande SM; Sötemann S; Aguilera Soriano G; Wentzel M; Audic JM; Ekama G
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):201-7. PubMed ID: 12361011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental investigation of the external nitrification biological nutrient removal activated sludge (ENBNRAS) system.
Hu ZR; Sötemann S; Moodley R; Wentzel MC; Ekama GA
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Aug; 83(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 12783482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Membrane bioreactors for final treatment of wastewater.
Galil NI; Sheindorf Ch; Stahl N; Tenenbaum A; Levinsky Y
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):103-10. PubMed ID: 14682576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Model-based optimisation of the biological performance of a sidestream MBR.
Nopens I; Sin G; Jiang T; d'Antonio L; Stama S; Zhao J; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):135-43. PubMed ID: 17898452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological nutrient removal in a small-scale MBR treating household wastewater.
Abegglen C; Ospelt M; Siegrist H
Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):338-46. PubMed ID: 17707877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pilot-scale waste activated sludge alkaline fermentation, fermentation liquid separation, and application of fermentation liquid to improve biological nutrient removal.
Li X; Chen H; Hu L; Yu L; Chen Y; Gu G
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(5):1834-9. PubMed ID: 21280571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of BNR activated sludge systems with membrane and settling tank solid-liquid separation.
Ramphao MC; Wentzel MC; Ekama GA; Alexander WV
Water Sci Technol; 2006; 53(12):295-303. PubMed ID: 16889266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hanced biological phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors.
Adam C; Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Buisson H; Krauma M
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):281-6. PubMed ID: 12361022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of feed characteristics on the organic matter, nitrogen and phosphorus removal in an activated sludge system treating piggery slurry.
González C; García PA; Muñoz R
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):2145-52. PubMed ID: 19844061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modification and expansion of a pure oxygen WWTP for biological nutrient removal (BNR).
Randall CW; Cokgor EU
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 11496669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of a 2-year investigation on enhanced biological nutrients removal and trace organics elimination in membrane bioreactor (MBR).
Lesjean B; Gnirss R; Buisson H; Keller S; Tazi-Pain A; Luck F
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):453-60. PubMed ID: 16459821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A predictive model for the reactor inorganic suspended solids concentration in activated sludge systems.
Ekama GA; Wentzel MC
Water Res; 2004 Nov; 38(19):4093-106. PubMed ID: 15491657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of IFAS wastewater treatment processes for biological phosphorus removal.
Sriwiriyarat T; Randall CW
Water Res; 2005 Oct; 39(16):3873-84. PubMed ID: 16126245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Small sewage treatment system with an anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic combined biofilter.
Park SM; Jun HB; Hong SP; Kwon JC
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):213-20. PubMed ID: 14753539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative performance between intermittently cyclic activated sludge-membrane bioreactor and anoxic/aerobic-membrane bioreactor.
Wang YL; Yu SL; Shi WX; Bao RL; Zhao Q; Zuo XT
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Sep; 100(17):3877-81. PubMed ID: 19362820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Adam C; Buisson H
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
