These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17899043)

  • 1. Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration.
    Alsius A; Navarra J; Soto-Faraco S
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 183(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 17899043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands.
    Alsius A; Navarra J; Campbell R; Soto-Faraco S
    Curr Biol; 2005 May; 15(9):839-43. PubMed ID: 15886102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Paying" attention to audiovisual speech: Do incongruent stimuli incur greater costs?
    Brown VA; Strand JF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1743-1756. PubMed ID: 31197661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiovisual integration of speech in a bistable illusion.
    Munhall KG; ten Hove MW; Brammer M; Paré M
    Curr Biol; 2009 May; 19(9):735-9. PubMed ID: 19345097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Top-down attention regulates the neural expression of audiovisual integration.
    Morís Fernández L; Visser M; Ventura-Campos N; Ávila C; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():272-85. PubMed ID: 26119022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic audiovisual integration in speech perception.
    Gentilucci M; Cattaneo L
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 16034571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audiovisual speech integration does not rely on the motor system: evidence from articulatory suppression, the McGurk effect, and fMRI.
    Matchin W; Groulx K; Hickok G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):606-20. PubMed ID: 24236768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The McGurk effect: An investigation of attentional capacity employing response times.
    Altieri N; Lentz JJ; Townsend JT; Wenger MJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1712-27. PubMed ID: 27188651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Timing in audiovisual speech perception: A mini review and new psychophysical data.
    Venezia JH; Thurman SM; Matchin W; George SE; Hickok G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):583-601. PubMed ID: 26669309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multistage audiovisual integration of speech: dissociating identification and detection.
    Eskelund K; Tuomainen J; Andersen TS
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 208(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 21188364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A role for the inferior colliculus in multisensory speech integration.
    Champoux F; Tremblay C; Mercier C; Lassonde M; Lepore F; Gagné JP; Théoret H
    Neuroreport; 2006 Oct; 17(15):1607-10. PubMed ID: 17001277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multisensory integration of speech sounds with letters vs. visual speech: only visual speech induces the mismatch negativity.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Keetels M; Vroomen J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 May; 47(9):1135-1145. PubMed ID: 29537657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Read My Lips: Brain Dynamics Associated with Audiovisual Integration and Deviance Detection.
    Tse CY; Gratton G; Garnsey SM; Novak MA; Fabiani M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1723-37. PubMed ID: 25848682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural correlates of multisensory integration of ecologically valid audiovisual events.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1964-73. PubMed ID: 17892381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental Shifts in Detection and Attention for Auditory, Visual, and Audiovisual Speech.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; Karl C; Abdi H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 61(12):3095-3112. PubMed ID: 30515515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The change in perceptual synchrony between auditory and visual speech after exposure to asynchronous speech.
    Tanaka A; Asakawa K; Imai H
    Neuroreport; 2011 Oct; 22(14):684-8. PubMed ID: 21817926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sight and sound out of synch: fragmentation and renormalisation of audiovisual integration and subjective timing.
    Freeman ED; Ipser A; Palmbaha A; Paunoiu D; Brown P; Lambert C; Leff A; Driver J
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2875-87. PubMed ID: 23664001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.