These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17901083)

  • 1. DIA-MCIS: an importance sampling network randomizer for network motif discovery and other topological observables in transcription networks.
    Fusco D; Bassetti B; Jona P; Lagomarsino MC
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(24):3388-90. PubMed ID: 17901083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synthetic microarray data generation with RANGE and NEMO.
    Long J; Roth M
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(1):132-4. PubMed ID: 17982169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Gibbs sampler for the identification of gene expression and network connectivity consistency.
    Brynildsen MP; Tran LM; Liao JC
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3040-6. PubMed ID: 17060361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective integration of multiple biological data for supervised network inference.
    Kato T; Tsuda K; Asai K
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2488-95. PubMed ID: 15728114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficient estimation of graphlet frequency distributions in protein-protein interaction networks.
    Przulj N; Corneil DG; Jurisica I
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):974-80. PubMed ID: 16452112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient sampling algorithm for estimating subgraph concentrations and detecting network motifs.
    Kashtan N; Itzkovitz S; Milo R; Alon U
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jul; 20(11):1746-58. PubMed ID: 15001476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generating Boolean networks with a prescribed attractor structure.
    Pal R; Ivanov I; Datta A; Bittner ML; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(21):4021-5. PubMed ID: 16150807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Building blocks of biological networks: a review on major network motif discovery algorithms.
    Masoudi-Nejad A; Schreiber F; Kashani ZR
    IET Syst Biol; 2012 Oct; 6(5):164-74. PubMed ID: 23101871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fitting a geometric graph to a protein-protein interaction network.
    Higham DJ; Rasajski M; Przulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 24(8):1093-9. PubMed ID: 18344248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. BNArray: an R package for constructing gene regulatory networks from microarray data by using Bayesian network.
    Chen X; Chen M; Ning K
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2952-4. PubMed ID: 17005537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structural comparison of metabolic networks in selected single cell organisms.
    Zhu D; Qin ZS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():8. PubMed ID: 15649332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Superiority of network motifs over optimal networks and an application to the revelation of gene network evolution.
    Ott S; Hansen A; Kim SY; Miyano S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(2):227-38. PubMed ID: 15377501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MAVisto: a tool for the exploration of network motifs.
    Schreiber F; Schwöbbermeyer H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21(17):3572-4. PubMed ID: 16020473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of reverse engineering gene regulatory networks with relevance networks, graphical gaussian models and bayesian networks.
    Werhli AV; Grzegorczyk M; Husmeier D
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2523-31. PubMed ID: 16844710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advances to Bayesian network inference for generating causal networks from observational biological data.
    Yu J; Smith VA; Wang PP; Hartemink AJ; Jarvis ED
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3594-603. PubMed ID: 15284094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time accelerated Monte Carlo simulations of biological networks using the binomial tau-leap method.
    Chatterjee A; Mayawala K; Edwards JS; Vlachos DG
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):2136-7. PubMed ID: 15699024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In silico Biochemical Reaction Network Analysis (IBRENA): a package for simulation and analysis of reaction networks.
    Liu G; Neelamegham S
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 24(8):1109-11. PubMed ID: 18310056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulating genetic networks made easy: network construction with simple building blocks.
    Vercruysse S; Kuiper M
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(2):269-71. PubMed ID: 15319258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An efficient algorithm for detecting frequent subgraphs in biological networks.
    Koyutürk M; Grama A; Szpankowski W
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 20 Suppl 1():i200-7. PubMed ID: 15262800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring biological network structure using exponential random graph models.
    Saul ZM; Filkov V
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Oct; 23(19):2604-11. PubMed ID: 17644557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.