These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17901980)

  • 1. Response inhibition under task switching: its strength depends on the amount of task-irrelevant response activation.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Psychol Res; 2008 Sep; 72(5):515-27. PubMed ID: 17901980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations.
    Druey MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response-repetition costs in task switching: how they are modulated by previous-trial response-category activation.
    Grzyb KR; Hübner R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 22137015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response execution, selection, or activation: what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?
    Hübner R; Druey MD
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jul; 70(4):245-61. PubMed ID: 16151720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Further investigating effects of task repetition proportion on
    Scheil J; Kleinsorge T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1629-1639. PubMed ID: 32238035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No evidence for the reduction of task competition and attentional adjustment during task-switching practice.
    Strobach T; Wendt M; Tomat M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103036. PubMed ID: 32086004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural correlates of the mechanism underlying negative response repetition effects in task-switching.
    Liu H; Zhang Q
    Brain Cogn; 2020 Nov; 145():105627. PubMed ID: 32980579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition.
    Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response inhibition in the task-switching paradigm.
    Liu H; Zhang Q
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Oct; 156():107954. PubMed ID: 32976924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response-repetition costs reflect changes to the representation of an action.
    Schacherer J; Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2146-2154. PubMed ID: 35618943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal distinctiveness and repetition benefits in task switching: disentangling stimulus-related and response-related contributions.
    Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):434-46. PubMed ID: 20680886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching.
    Dreisbach G; Wenke D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1540-6. PubMed ID: 21707220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of associative learning on age differences in task-set switching.
    Kray J; Eppinger B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):187-203. PubMed ID: 16564483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feature Integration and Task Switching: Diminished Switch Costs after Controlling for Stimulus, Response, and Cue Repetitions.
    Schmidt JR; Liefooghe B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151188. PubMed ID: 26964102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings.
    Schneider DW; Verbruggen F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1629-40. PubMed ID: 18609408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response-repetition costs in choice-RT tasks: biased expectancies or response inhibition?
    Druey MD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():21-32. PubMed ID: 24269885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Excessive response-repetition costs under task switching: how response inhibition amplifies response conflict.
    Grzyb KR; Hübner R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):126-39. PubMed ID: 22612160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching.
    Benini E; Koch I; Mayr S; Frings C; Philipp AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Aug; 76(8):1872-1888. PubMed ID: 36112986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.