747 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17902064)
1. Postoperative and midterm outcomes of minimally invasive and endoscopic great saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting - a prospective analysis.
Simek M; Nemec P; Bruk V; Gwozdziewicz M; Fluger I; Langova K
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Oct; 55(7):428-32. PubMed ID: 17902064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative analysis of saphenous vein conduit harvesting techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting--standard bridging versus the open technique.
Khan UA; Krishnamoorthy B; Najam O; Waterworth P; Fildes JE; Yonan N
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jan; 10(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19696051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Routine minimal invasive vein harvesting reduces postoperative morbidity in cardiac bypass procedures. Clinical report of 1400 patients.
Coppoolse R; Rees W; Krech R; Hufnagel M; Seufert K; Warnecke H
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S61-6. PubMed ID: 10613559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Operative outcomes of minimally invasive saphenous vein harvest.
Horvath KD; Gray D; Benton L; Hill J; Swanstrom LL
Am J Surg; 1998 May; 175(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 9600285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive long saphenous vein harvesting using a laryngoscope.
Stavridis GT; Bobos D; Matsouka F; Lacoumenta S; Alivizatos PA
Heart Surg Forum; 1998; 1(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 11276438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Markar SR; Kutty R; Edmonds L; Sadat U; Nair S
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 10(2):266-70. PubMed ID: 19942633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic versus minimally invasive vein harvesting. Impact on leg-related morbidity in coronary artery bypass surgery: one-year follow-up of a prospective trial.
Simek M; Nemec P; Gwozdziewicz M; Langova K; Studentova H; Bruk V; Hajek R; Lonsky V
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2008 Oct; 49(5):673-8. PubMed ID: 18670386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting.
Allen KB; Heimansohn DA; Robison RJ; Schier JJ; Griffith GL; Fitzgerald EB; Isch JH; Abraham S; Shaar CJ
Heart Surg Forum; 2000; 3(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 11178296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting: is there an improvement of the results with the endoscopic approach?
Isgro F; Weisse U; Voss B; Kiessling AH; Saggau W
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S58-60. PubMed ID: 10613558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prophylactic low-energy shock wave therapy improves wound healing after vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective, randomized trial.
Dumfarth J; Zimpfer D; Vögele-Kadletz M; Holfeld J; Sihorsch F; Schaden W; Czerny M; Aharinejad S; Wolner E; Grimm M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Dec; 86(6):1909-13. PubMed ID: 19022007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. eComment: Leg wound morbidities after saphenous vein harvesting techniques. Which is better?
Gunay R; Sensoz Y; Kayacioglu I
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jan; 10(1):31. PubMed ID: 20019038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Ouzounian M; Hassan A; Buth KJ; MacPherson C; Ali IM; Hirsch GM; Ali IS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 89(2):403-8. PubMed ID: 20103309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvest with the SaphLITE system.
O-Yurvati AH; Martin AK; Peska D
Int Surg; 2005; 90(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 15912895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic vs. conventional vein harvesting: first results with a new, non-disposable system.
Lutz CW; Hillmann R; Lutter G; Schoellhorn J; Beyersdorf F
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Dec; 49(6):321-7. PubMed ID: 11745052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic vein harvest: advantages and limitations.
Bonde P; Graham AN; MacGowan SW
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 77(6):2076-82. PubMed ID: 15172271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized trial.
Andreasen JJ; Nekrasas V; Dethlefsen C
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 34(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 18508277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Saphenous vein harvest with SaphLITE system versus conventional technique: a prospective, randomized study.
Wang S; Tang H; Wilkinson V; Lukat T; Gelfand ET; Koshal A; Modry DL; Mullen JC; Hao C; Finegan BA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):2018-23. PubMed ID: 15919302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is minimally invasive harvesting of the great saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery a cost-effective technique?
Rao C; Aziz O; Deeba S; Chow A; Jones C; Ni Z; Papastavrou L; Rahman S; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 18374760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting using a laryngoscope: procedural, functional, and morphologic evaluation.
Basbug HS; Tasatargil A; Aksoy NH; Golbasi I; Turkay C; Mete A; Sadan G; Bayezid O
Heart Surg Forum; 2005; 8(6):E425-30. PubMed ID: 16283978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Leg wound infections following greater saphenous vein harvesting: minimally invasive vein harvesting versus conventional vein harvesting.
Reed JF
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2008 Dec; 7(4):210-9. PubMed ID: 18815201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
