256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17902454)
1. Reducing rejections, revitalizing revenue.
Devin T
Health Manag Technol; 2007 Sep; 28(9):38-9. PubMed ID: 17902454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Internet: a low-cost method of electronic claims submission.
Kaufmann CM; Bennett S
Patient Acc; 1999 Sep; 22(9):2-3. PubMed ID: 10621472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What works. Pediatric group cuts staff, billing cycle; reduces claims cost to a dime with Internet processing.
Beauchamp G
Health Manag Technol; 1998 Aug; 19(9):38. PubMed ID: 10182549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bell curve tolls for practice.
Martin Z
Health Data Manag; 2008 Jan; 16(1):72, 74. PubMed ID: 18225810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Boost the bottom line. Internet solutions speed Medicare claims processing.
DeNicola C
Provider; 2010 Oct; 36(10):73-4, 77. PubMed ID: 21038821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How to make the CBO model work for you.
Hajny T
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 15500020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Staying one step ahead of claim rejections.
Boerger G
Revenue-cycle Strateg; 2015 Mar; 12(2):7. PubMed ID: 25997213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. At the speed of EDI. Physician practice converts to EDI and slashes both its claims turnaround and accounts receivable days.
Topel K; Mullen H
Health Manag Technol; 2002 Feb; 23(2):26. PubMed ID: 11842576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. California IPA rings in raises even in declining market.
Capitation Rates Data; 2004 Mar; 9(3):28-9. PubMed ID: 15098500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. MGMA DataDive Cost and Revenue Modules can help you improve practice efficiency, keep up with evolving trends and plan for the future.
MGMA Connex; 2013 Oct; 13(9):63. PubMed ID: 24383139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. One billing provider is better than two: How Central Indiana's largest physician anesthesia group streamlined revenue cycle management.
Satz AK
Health Manag Technol; 2012 Jun; 33(6):18. PubMed ID: 22787947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Living happily after the installation. Unexpected benefits result when a private group practice uses its medical document management system to eliminate paper charts.
Connell JM
Health Manag Technol; 2004 Feb; 25(2):62-4. PubMed ID: 14870600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. CPT codes: get ready for 2008.
Halenar BF
Med Econ; 2007 Dec; 84(24):29-30, 32-3. PubMed ID: 18257424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Keeping PACE: anatomy of a turnaround.
Patmas MA
Physician Exec; 2006; 32(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16509398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. When the technical is crucial: looking at IBNR (incurred but not reported).
Bennett G
Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1998 Oct; 7(10):9-11. PubMed ID: 10187150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Find a billing boss who fits the bill.
Lowes R
Med Econ; 2002 Mar; 79(6):73-4, 79-80. PubMed ID: 11951594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Getting paid the first time. North Carolina specialty practice gains from claims and coding software.
Bobst P
Health Manag Technol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):60. PubMed ID: 12592731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing lost revenue from inpatient medical-necessity denials.
Olaniyan O
Healthc Financ Manage; 2015 Feb; 69(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 26665543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. After playing with fire, this group went down in flames.
Slomski AJ
Med Econ; 1999 Sep; 76(17):99-100, 105-6, 111-5. PubMed ID: 10558235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pursuing practice excellence.
Heavey JF
Health Manag Technol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 18286937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
