These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17902493)

  • 1. Life and death before birth: 4D ultrasound and the shifting frontiers of the abortion debate.
    Savell K
    J Law Med; 2007 Aug; 15(1):103-16. PubMed ID: 17902493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technology and the legal discourse of fetal autonomy.
    Morris C
    UCLA Womens Law J; 1997; 8(1):47-97. PubMed ID: 16273687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An inside look at partial birth abortion.
    Lowe LR
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998-1999; 24():327-57. PubMed ID: 16180289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
    Callahan D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New attention for 2002 law on survivors of abortions.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Apr; ():A10. PubMed ID: 15940860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulating IVF human embryo experimentation: the search for a legal basis.
    Kasimba P
    Aust Law J; 1988 Feb; 62(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 11659149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Waller, Warnock and Roe v. Wade: variations on the status of the orphan embryo--comment.
    Van de Weghe B
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():231-54. PubMed ID: 11645586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The concept of brain life: shifting the abortion standard without imposing religious values.
    Cornwell JR
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1987; 23(5):471-9. PubMed ID: 16100797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law.
    Cica N
    Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
    Martyn K
    UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Va. debates law on fetal homicide: legislation entangled with abortion issue.
    Nakashima E
    Washington Post; 1996 Feb; ():D1, D5. PubMed ID: 11647497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
    Chemerinsky E
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
    Buckley M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
    Rubenfeld J
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
    Siano JR
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legal criteria for distinguishing between live and dead human foetuses and newborn children.
    Bates P
    Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 11649731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases.
    Klasing MS
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal rights? It depends.
    Doudera AE
    Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):38-44, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11649512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
    Barber RA
    Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.