These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17902493)
21. Abortion: is there a rational precept? Reiter RC; Johnson SR; Beller FK Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):464-7. PubMed ID: 1876385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject. Himma KE J Med Ethics; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15634753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The legal status of the unborn after Webster. Parness JA Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A narrative analysis of anti-abortion testimony and legislative debate related to Georgia's fetal "heartbeat" abortion ban. Evans DP; Narasimhan S Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2020 Dec; 28(1):1686201. PubMed ID: 31892281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection. Johnsen DE Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The case for a second trimester abortion. Furedi A Conscience; 2004-2005 Winter; 25(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 16538753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Religion, politics, and abortion. Perry MJ Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 2001; 79(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 16538743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. When the death of a fetus is murder. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1994 May; ():B20. PubMed ID: 11647483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Abortion: toward a standard based upon clinical medical signs of life and death. Kennedy JE; Nicolazzo M J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(4):545-63. PubMed ID: 11655793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act: baby steps toward the recognition of life after birth. Scaldo SA Nova Law Rev; 2002; 26(2):485-510. PubMed ID: 16270465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system. Kindregan CP Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely! Massie AM Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The juridical status of the fetus: a proposal for legal protection of the unborn. King PA Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1647-87. PubMed ID: 10245967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Abortion and the right of privacy. Ortega ML Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The social construction of personhood. Burkhart J Soc Thought; 1989; 15():2-13. PubMed ID: 11659411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Banning partial-birth abortions: a few inches away from testing post-viability jurisprudence. Flanagan PP Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):141-77. PubMed ID: 16514753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study. Olmstead FH Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]