These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17902870)

  • 1. When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Ito M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2354-64. PubMed ID: 17902870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 11051513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis.
    Gerratt BR; Kreiman J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2560-6. PubMed ID: 11757945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2201-11. PubMed ID: 15898661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice.
    Helou LB; Solomon NP; Henry LR; Coppit GL; Howard RS; Stojadinovic A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Aug; 19(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 20484704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The multidimensional nature of pathologic vocal quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1291-302. PubMed ID: 7962996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of consensus training on the reliability of auditory perceptual ratings of voice quality.
    Iwarsson J; Reinholt Petersen N
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 21840170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Sep; 104(3 Pt 1):1598-608. PubMed ID: 9745743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual analysis in different voice samples: agreement and reliability.
    Muñoz J; Mendoza E; Fresneda MD; Carballo G; Ramirez I
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1187-95. PubMed ID: 12186240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].
    Ptok M; Schwemmle C; Iven C; Jessen M; Nawka T
    HNO; 2006 Oct; 54(10):793-802. PubMed ID: 16132879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
    Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction of speech coders and atypical speech II: effects on speech quality.
    Jamieson DG; Parsa V; Price MC; Till J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Aug; 45(4):689-99. PubMed ID: 12199399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings.
    Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Kempster GB; Erman A; Berke GS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 36(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 8450660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Perception of Breathiness in the Voices of Pediatric Speakers.
    Kopf LM; Skowronski MD; Anand S; Eddins DA; Shrivastav R
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):204-213. PubMed ID: 29162356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
    Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inexperienced Listeners' Perception of Timbre Dissimilarity Within and Between Voice Categories.
    Erickson ML
    J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):302.e1-302.e13. PubMed ID: 30316552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of voice quality ratings made by Japanese and American listeners using the GRBAS scale.
    Yamaguchi H; Shrivastav R; Andrews ML; Niimi S
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(3):147-57. PubMed ID: 12771466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in voice quality perception.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Precoda K; Berke GS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 1608242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.