158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17902876)
1. Characterization of ultrasound-induced fracture of polymer-shelled ultrasonic contrast agents by correlation analysis.
Pecorari C; Grishenkov D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2425-30. PubMed ID: 17902876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of acoustic properties of PVA-shelled ultrasound contrast agents: linear properties (part I).
Grishenkov D; Pecorari C; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1127-38. PubMed ID: 19427099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation on the inertial cavitation threshold and shell properties of commercialized ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
Guo X; Li Q; Zhang Z; Zhang D; Tu J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1622-31. PubMed ID: 23927202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acoustic characterization of single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
Sijl J; Gaud E; Frinking PJ; Arditi M; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):4091-7. PubMed ID: 19206831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic characterization and contrast imaging of microbubbles encapsulated by polymeric shells coated or filled with magnetic nanoparticles.
Sciallero C; Grishenkov D; Kothapalli SV; Oddo L; Trucco A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3918-30. PubMed ID: 24180801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A preliminary in vitro assessment of polymer-shelled microbubbles in contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Sciallero C; Paradossi G; Trucco A
Ultrasonics; 2012 Mar; 52(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 22133737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling complicated rheological behaviors in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated microbubbles accounting for nonlinear changes of both shell viscosity and elasticity.
Li Q; Matula TJ; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(4):985-98. PubMed ID: 23339902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of acoustic properties of PVA-shelled ultrasound contrast agents: ultrasound-induced fracture (part II).
Grishenkov D; Pecorari C; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1139-47. PubMed ID: 19427102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Compression-only" behavior: a second-order nonlinear response of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
Sijl J; Overvelde M; Dollet B; Garbin V; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):1729-39. PubMed ID: 21476630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative measurement of ultrasound disruption of polymer-shelled microbubbles.
Bevan PD; Karshafian R; Tickner EG; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1777-86. PubMed ID: 17656011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of acoustic insonation parameters on ultrasound contrast agent destruction.
Yeh CK; Su SY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1281-91. PubMed ID: 18343019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound assessment of polymer-shelled magnetic microbubbles used as dual contrast agents.
Sciallero C; Trucco A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):EL478-84. PubMed ID: 23742443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancement of subharmonic emission from encapsulated microbubbles by using a chirp excitation technique.
Zhang D; Gong Y; Gong X; Liu Z; Tan K; Zheng H
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5531-44. PubMed ID: 17804880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles.
Grishenkov D; Kari L; Brodin LK; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20542310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical relevance of pressure-dependent scattering at low acoustic pressures.
Emmer M; Vos HJ; van Wamel A; Goertz DE; Versluis M; de Jong N
Ultrasonics; 2007 Dec; 47(1-4):74-7. PubMed ID: 17845809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic Characterization and Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Long-Circulating Lipid-Coated Microbubbles.
Li H; Yang Y; Zhang M; Yin L; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 May; 37(5):1243-1256. PubMed ID: 29127707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overview of experimental studies of biological effects of medical ultrasound caused by gas body activation and inertial cavitation.
Miller DL
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2007; 93(1-3):314-30. PubMed ID: 16989895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vascular effects induced by combined 1-MHz ultrasound and microbubble contrast agent treatments in vivo.
Hwang JH; Brayman AA; Reidy MA; Matula TJ; Kimmey MB; Crum LA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 31(4):553-64. PubMed ID: 15831334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inertial cavitation threshold of nested microbubbles.
Wallace N; Dicker S; Lewin P; Wrenn SP
Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():67-74. PubMed ID: 25620709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unique pumping-out fracturing mechanism of a polymer-shelled contrast agent: an acoustic characterization and optical visualization.
Kothapalli SV; Daeichin V; Mastik F; Brodin LÅ; Janerot-Sjoberg B; Paradossi G; de Jong N; Grishenkov D
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Mar; 62(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 25768814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
