These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17903753)

  • 41. [The new x-ray ordinance].
    Schütz J
    Radiologe; 1988 Jan; 28(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 3344343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Dose reduction and government priorities.
    Holloway AF; Taylor KW; Hobbs BB
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Jun; 35(2):106. PubMed ID: 6480658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Quantifying radiation safety and quality in medical imaging, part 2: the radiation scorecard.
    Reiner BI
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Sep; 6(9):615-9. PubMed ID: 19720355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A novel quality assurance method in a university teaching paediatric radiology department.
    Gallet JM; Reed MH; Hlady J
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Aug; 73(872):843-6. PubMed ID: 11026859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Patient exposure during radiodiagnosis. The Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends (NEXT) program in Italy].
    Calicchia A; Mazzei F; Dobici F; Paganini Fioratti M; Indovina PL
    Radiol Med; 1991 Jun; 81(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 1857802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Quality assurance in radiology from the viewpoint of the specialists and the supervisory authorities].
    Ewen K
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):362-6. PubMed ID: 1410321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Optimization of image quality and radiation exposure in x-ray diagnosis. Report on a Workshop of the EG-Commission and the National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Oxon, Oxford, September, 1988].
    Golder W
    Rontgenpraxis; 1989 Sep; 42(9):315-21. PubMed ID: 2799553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Constancy check of beam quality in conventional diagnostic X-ray equipment.
    Costa AM; Badin RS; Leite MS; Caldas LV
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Oct; 66(10):1403-5. PubMed ID: 18434171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
    Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [The quality of radiology services in five Latin American countries].
    Fleitas I; Caspani CC; Borrás C; Plazas MC; Miranda AA; Brandan ME; de la Mora R
    Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2006; 20(2-3):113-24. PubMed ID: 17199906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Quality assurance in the microfilming of x-ray pictures].
    Haverkamp U; Kronholz HL; Pötter R
    Rofo; 1989 Apr; 150(4):472-4. PubMed ID: 2539629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of imaging guidelines on the number and quality of outpatient radiographic examinations.
    Moskowitz H; Sunshine J; Grossman D; Adams L; Gelinas L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jul; 175(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10882239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. X-ray waveform monitoring for radiographic quality control.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Webbles WE; Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1985; 57(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 4059531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Objective quality metrics and personal dashboards for quality improvement.
    Khorasani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Aug; 6(8):549-50. PubMed ID: 19643381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Seekers of quality in radiology submit report from the trenches.
    Shrago G
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; 21(11):143-5, 147, 149 passim. PubMed ID: 10724835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography.
    Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Outsourced teleradiology imaging services: an analysis of discordant interpretation in 124,870 cases.
    Wong WS; Roubal I; Jackson DB; Paik WN; Wong VK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 17411863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Quality assurance in dental radiography: intra-oral image quality analysis.
    Bolas A; Fitzgerald M
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 54(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 19189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.