229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17904234)
1. Clinical evaluation of monitor unit software and the application of action levels.
Georg D; Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Kjaer-Kristoffersen F; Schnekenburger B; Winkler P; Nyström H; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Nov; 85(2):306-15. PubMed ID: 17904234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient-specific IMRT verification using independent fluence-based dose calculation software: experimental benchmarking and initial clinical experience.
Georg D; Stock M; Kroupa B; Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4981-92. PubMed ID: 17671348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of monitor units calculated by radiotherapy treatment planning system and an independent monitor unit verification software.
Sellakumar P; Arun C; Sanjay SS; Ramesh SB
Phys Med; 2011 Jan; 27(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 20172756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiotherapy feasibility study for a filmless approach.
Wiezorek T; Banz N; Schwedas M; Scheithauer M; Salz H; Georg D; Wendt TG
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Jul; 181(7):468-74. PubMed ID: 15995841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine.
Seco J; Adams E; Bidmead M; Partridge M; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):817-30. PubMed ID: 15798257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical implementation of dynamic and step-and-shoot IMRT to treat prostate cancer with high risk of pelvic lymph node involvement.
Adams EJ; Convery DJ; Cosgrove VP; McNair HA; Staffurth JN; Vaarkamp J; Nutting CM; Warrington AP; Webb S; Balyckyi J; Dearnaley DP
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Jan; 70(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15036846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A dose verification method using a monitor unit matrix for dynamic IMRT on Varian linear accelerators.
Chen X; Yue NJ; Chen W; Saw CB; Heron DE; Stefanik D; Antemann R; Huq MS
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5641-52. PubMed ID: 16306658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of an aSi-based EPID for routine absolute dosimetric pre-treatment verification of dynamic IMRT fields.
Van Esch A; Depuydt T; Huyskens DP
Radiother Oncol; 2004 May; 71(2):223-34. PubMed ID: 15110457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A simple theoretical verification of monitor unit calculation for intensity modulated beams using dynamic mini-multileaf collimation.
Linthout N; Verellen D; Van Acker S; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 2004 May; 71(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 15110458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D dose reconstruction for clinical evaluation of IMRT pretreatment verification with an EPID.
van Zijtveld M; Dirkx ML; de Boer HC; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Feb; 82(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 17287039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Moving from IMRT QA measurements toward independent computer calculations using control charts.
Pawlicki T; Yoo S; Court LE; McMillan SK; Rice RK; Russell JD; Pacyniak JM; Woo MK; Basran PS; Shoales J; Boyer AL
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Dec; 89(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 18701175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy of 172 patients treated for various disease sites: comparison of EBT film dosimetry, ion chamber measurements, and independent MU calculations.
Wilcox EE; Daskalov GM; Pavlonnis G; Shumway R; Kaplan B; VanRooy E
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 18973859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric verification of brain and head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment using EDR2 films and 2D ion chamber array matrix.
Varatharaj C; Ravikumar M; Sathiyan S; Supe SS; Vivek TR; Manikandan A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 20622365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The next step in patient-specific QA: 3D dose verification of conformal and intensity-modulated RT based on EPID dosimetry and Monte Carlo dose calculations.
van Elmpt W; Nijsten S; Mijnheer B; Dekker A; Lambin P
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18054102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A methodology for verification of radiotherapy dose calculation.
Agazaryan N; Ullrich W; Lee SP; Solberg TD
J Neurosurg; 2004 Nov; 101 Suppl 3():356-61. PubMed ID: 15537190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicentre quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans: a precursor to clinical trials.
Williams MJ; Bailey M; Forstner D; Metcalfe PE
Australas Radiol; 2007 Oct; 51(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 17803801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Independent calculation-based verification of IMRT plans using a 3D dose-calculation engine.
Arumugam S; Xing A; Goozee G; Holloway L
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 23790325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of IMRT treatment plans between linac and helical tomotherapy based on integral dose and inhomogeneity index.
Shi C; Peñagarícano J; Papanikolaou N
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 18674686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
