These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17904348)

  • 1. The potential of financial incentives to enhance householders' kerbside recycling behaviour.
    Shaw PJ; Maynard SJ
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(10):1732-41. PubMed ID: 17904348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the relationship between set-out rates and participation ratios as a tool for enhancement of kerbside household waste recycling.
    Shaw PJ; Lyas JK; Maynard SJ; van Vugt M
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 16631302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pay as you throw: strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing in household waste collection systems in Sweden.
    Dahlén L; Lagerkvist A
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jan; 30(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19833498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Household demand for waste recycling services.
    Palatnik R; Ayalon O; Shechter M
    Environ Manage; 2005 Feb; 35(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 15902451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ecological relevance of transport in waste disposal systems in Western Europe.
    Salhofer S; Schneider F; Obersteiner G
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):S47-57. PubMed ID: 17544851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating household preferences for kerbside recycling services in London: a choice experiment approach.
    Karousakis K; Birol E
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Sep; 88(4):1099-108. PubMed ID: 17658678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic potential of recycling business in Lahore, Pakistan.
    Batool SA; Chaudhry N; Majeed K
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(2):294-8. PubMed ID: 17475469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of a UK kerbside scheme using known practice.
    Woodard R; Bench M; Harder MK
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Apr; 75(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 15763154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Household behaviour and attitudes with respect to recycling food waste--experiences from focus groups.
    Refsgaard K; Magnussen K
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):760-71. PubMed ID: 18394776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sorting and disposing of waste at recycling centres--a user's perspective.
    Eklund J; Kihlstedt A; Engkvist IL
    Appl Ergon; 2010 May; 41(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 19674735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impacts of a recycling surcharge to increase landfill tipping fees in Wisconsin.
    Katers JF; Walczak D; Burch T
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Aug; 27(5):501-11. PubMed ID: 19423604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recycling behaviour of householders living in multicultural urban area: a case study of Jarva, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Miafodzyeva S; Brandt N; Andersson M
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 May; 31(5):447-57. PubMed ID: 23435616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An investigation into the kerbside recycling behaviour of two Welsh case study authorities.
    Woollam T; Williams KW; Griffiths A
    Waste Manag Res; 2006 Aug; 24(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 16941993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of distance on the motivation and frequency of household recycling.
    González-Torre PL; Adenso-Díaz B
    Waste Manag; 2005; 25(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 15681175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and application of a multiple linear regression model to consider the impact of weekly waste container capacity on the yield from kerbside recycling programmes in Scotland.
    Baird J; Curry R; Reid T
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Mar; 31(3):306-14. PubMed ID: 23315369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urban waste recycling behavior: antecedents of participation in a selective collection program.
    Garcés C; Lafuente A; Pedraja M; Rivera P
    Environ Manage; 2002 Sep; 30(3):378-90. PubMed ID: 12148072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Residents' behaviors, attitudes, and willingness to pay for recycling e-waste in Macau.
    Song Q; Wang Z; Li J
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Sep; 106():8-16. PubMed ID: 22562006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Financing electronic waste recycling Californian households' willingness to pay advanced recycling fees.
    Nixon H; Saphores JD
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 16979285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Steel can recycling: how to cut costs and support the environment.
    Crawford G
    Healthc Foodserv; 1995; 5(4):11. PubMed ID: 10152490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Source segregation and food waste prevention activities in high-density households in a deprived urban area.
    Rispo A; Williams ID; Shaw PJ
    Waste Manag; 2015 Oct; 44():15-27. PubMed ID: 26233881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.