These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17905406)

  • 41. Effect of low aeration rate on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in an intermittent aeration aged refuse bioreactor treating leachate.
    Sun X; Zhang H; Cheng Z; Wang S
    Waste Manag; 2017 May; 63():410-416. PubMed ID: 28089204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Influence of filtration conditions on membrane fouling and scouring aeration effectiveness in submerged membrane bioreactors to treat municipal wastewater.
    Nywening JP; Zhou H
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(14):3548-58. PubMed ID: 19501871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Long-term aeration management for improved N-removal via SND in a sequencing batch reactor.
    Third KA; Gibbs B; Newland M; Cord-Ruwisch R
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(15):3523-30. PubMed ID: 16055164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Investigation of oxygen transfer rates in full scale membrane bioreactors.
    Cornel P; Wagner M; Krause S
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):313-9. PubMed ID: 12906305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Influencing factors for operational performance of a biofilm reactor with microbubble aeration using SPG membrane].
    Zhang L; Zhang M; Liu C; Zhang J; Liu JL
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2014 Aug; 35(8):3024-30. PubMed ID: 25338375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Impacts of membrane flux enhancers on activated sludge respiration and nutrient removal in MBRs.
    Iversen V; Koseoglu H; Yigit NO; Drews A; Kitis M; Lesjean B; Kraume M
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):822-30. PubMed ID: 19100595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of condensate of food waste (CFW) on nutrient removal and behaviours of intercellular materials in a vertical submerged membrane bioreactor (VSMBR).
    Chae SR; Shin HS
    Bioresour Technol; 2007 Jan; 98(2):373-9. PubMed ID: 16473006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Influence of diatomite addition on membrane fouling and performance in a submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Yang XL; Song HL; Lu JL; Fu DF; Cheng B
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Dec; 101(23):9178-84. PubMed ID: 20685114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Laboratory study of nitrification, denitrification and anammox processes in membrane bioreactors considering periodic aeration.
    Abbassi R; Yadav AK; Huang S; Jaffé PR
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Sep; 142():53-9. PubMed ID: 24814548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of the performance of submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and submerged membrane adsorption bioreactor (SMABR).
    Guo W; Vigneswaran S; Ngo HH; Xing W; Goteti P
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Mar; 99(5):1012-7. PubMed ID: 17499503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Domestic wastewater treatment by a submerged MBR (membrane bio-reactor) with enhanced air sparging.
    Chang IS; Judd SJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):149-54. PubMed ID: 12926682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of extracellular polymeric substances on nitrogen removal in an intermittently-aerated membrane bioreactor.
    Nagaoka H; Nemoto H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(11):151-8. PubMed ID: 16114628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Advanced nitrogen elimination by encapsulated nitrifiers.
    Sievers M; Vorlop KD; Hahne J; Schlieker M; Schäfer S
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):19-26. PubMed ID: 14682566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluating the effect of air flow rate on hybrid and conventional membrane bioreactors: Implications on performance, microbial activity and membrane fouling.
    Belli TJ; Bassin JP; Costa RE; Akaboci TRV; Battistelli AA; Lobo-Recio MA; Lapolli FR
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Feb; 755(Pt 2):142563. PubMed ID: 33059133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Seasonal variation in membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater.
    Miyoshi T; Tsuyuhara T; Ogyu R; Kimura K; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Dec; 43(20):5109-18. PubMed ID: 19767055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of different recirculation schemes on nitrogen removal and overall performance of a laboratory scale MBR.
    Bracklow U; Manigas L; Drews A; Vocks M; Barjenbruch M; Kraume M
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):115-24. PubMed ID: 17898450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Total nitrogen removal in a hybrid, membrane-aerated activated sludge process.
    Downing LS; Nerenberg R
    Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3697-708. PubMed ID: 18707749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Theoretical analysis and enhanced nitrogen removal performance of step-feed SBR.
    Guo J; Peng Y; Yang Q; Wang S; Chen Y; Zhao C
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(4):795-802. PubMed ID: 18776614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Biomass characteristics and membrane aeration: toward a better understanding of membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs).
    Germain E; Stephenson T; Pearce P
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 15800864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Effect of aeration intensity on the nitrogen and phosphorus removal performance of AOA membrane bioreactors].
    Chen XY; Xue ZY; Xiao JN; Zhang HM; Yang FL; Wang WP; Hong CL; Zhu FX
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Oct; 32(10):2979-85. PubMed ID: 22279912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.