472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17905553)
1. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study.
McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM
Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency format diagram and probability chart for breast cancer risk communication: a prospective, randomized trial.
Ghosh K; Crawford BJ; Pruthi S; Williams CI; Neal L; Sandhu NP; Johnson RE; Wahner-Roedler D; Britain MK; Cha SS; Ghosh AK
BMC Womens Health; 2008 Oct; 8():18. PubMed ID: 18937844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mortality versus survival graphs: improving temporal consistency in perceptions of treatment effectiveness.
Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Ubel PA
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Apr; 66(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 17137743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
Keller C; Siegrist M
Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 19525484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Communicating quality of life information to cancer patients: a study of six presentation formats.
Brundage M; Feldman-Stewart D; Leis A; Bezjak A; Degner L; Velji K; Zetes-Zanatta L; Tu D; Ritvo P; Pater J
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(28):6949-56. PubMed ID: 16192583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatment.
Timmermans D; Molewijk B; Stiggelbout A; Kievit J
Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Sep; 54(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15324976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of graphic format on breast cancer risk communication.
Schapira MM; Nattinger AB; McAuliffe TL
J Health Commun; 2006 Sep; 11(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 16950729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income parents: a comparison of print, video, and computer-based presentations.
Campbell FA; Goldman BD; Boccia ML; Skinner M
Patient Educ Couns; 2004 May; 53(2):205-16. PubMed ID: 15140461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.
Visschers VH; Meertens RM; Passchier WW; de Vries NN
Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 19000070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Expressing medicine side effects: assessing the effectiveness of absolute risk, relative risk, and number needed to harm, and the provision of baseline risk information.
Berry DC; Knapp P; Raynor T
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):89-96. PubMed ID: 16242904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.
Hawley ST; Zikmund-Fisher B; Ubel P; Jancovic A; Lucas T; Fagerlin A
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):448-55. PubMed ID: 18755566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: judgments of gist in treatment decisions.
Feldman-Stewart D; Brundage MD; Zotov V
Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 17237451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics.
Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Ubel PA
Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(6):661-71. PubMed ID: 20375419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of numeracy on the comprehension of information about medicines in users of a patient information website.
Gardner PH; McMillan B; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Knapp P
Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jun; 83(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 21621949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence-based patient information about treatment of multiple sclerosis--a phase one study on comprehension and emotional responses.
Kasper J; Köpke S; Mühlhauser I; Heesen C
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jul; 62(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 16098706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Presentation format affects comprehension and risk assessment: the case of prenatal screening.
Miron-Shatz T; Hanoch Y; Graef D; Sagi M
J Health Commun; 2009; 14(5):439-50. PubMed ID: 19657924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of an illustrated medication schedule as a low-literacy patient education tool.
Kripalani S; Robertson R; Love-Ghaffari MH; Henderson LE; Praska J; Strawder A; Katz MG; Jacobson TA
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jun; 66(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 17344015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
