794 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17905900)
1. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults.
Jenstad LM; Souza PE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17905900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
Kates JM
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combining temporal-envelope cues across channels: effects of age and hearing loss.
Souza PE; Boike KT
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 49(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 16533079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56. PubMed ID: 18367695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility.
Jenstad LM; Souza PE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):651-67. PubMed ID: 16197279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of speaker age on speech recognition and perceived listening effort in older adults with hearing loss.
McAuliffe MJ; Wilding PJ; Rickard NA; O'Beirne GA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 22232404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
Johnson JA; Cox RM; Alexander GC
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
Chung K; Killion MC; Christensen LA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
Feng Y; Yin S; Kiefte M; Wang J
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
