These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17905947)

  • 1. A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Itayem R; Arndt A; McMinn DJ; Daniel J; Lundberg A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1140-3. PubMed ID: 17905947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stability of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty at two years. A radiostereophotogrammetric analysis study.
    Itayem R; Arndt A; Nistor L; McMinn D; Lundberg A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 87(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 15736734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-year migration results of the ReCap hip resurfacing system-a radiostereometric follow-up study of 23 hips.
    Baad-Hansen T; Storgaard Jakobsen S; Soballe K
    Int Orthop; 2011 Apr; 35(4):497-502. PubMed ID: 20195597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: short-term clinical and radiographic outcome.
    Witzleb WC; Arnold M; Krummenauer F; Knecht A; Ranisch H; Günther KP
    Eur J Med Res; 2008 Jan; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 18226996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years.
    Treacy RB; McBryde CW; Pynsent PB
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 87(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 15736736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty.
    Loughead JM; Chesney D; Holland JP; McCaskie AW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 87(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 15736735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A two-year study.
    Glyn-Jones S; Gill HS; McLardy-Smith P; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2004 Mar; 86(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 15046428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up.
    Heilpern GN; Shah NN; Fordyce MJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18757951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A two-year radiostereometric follow-up of the first generation Birmingham mid head resection arthroplasty.
    Itayem R; Arndt A; Daniel J; McMinn DJ; Lundberg A
    Hip Int; 2014; 24(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 24817401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing for Crowe type-I and II developmental dysplasia.
    Amstutz HC; Antoniades JT; Le Duff MJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Feb; 89(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 17272449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of cementless expansion acetabular component and an alumina-polyethylene bearing in total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis.
    Kim YG; Kim SY; Kim SJ; Park BC; Kim PT; Ihn JC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Jun; 87(6):776-80. PubMed ID: 15911657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of the Elite Plus femoral component using radiostereometric analysis.
    Derbyshire B; Porter ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jun; 89(6):730-5. PubMed ID: 17613495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series.
    Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; Pynsent PB; McMinn DJ
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1298-306. PubMed ID: 25274912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ball ST; Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Apr; 89(4):735-41. PubMed ID: 17403794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinicoradiologic study of the Birmingham Mid-Head Resection device.
    Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; McMinn DJ
    Orthopedics; 2008 Dec; 31(12 Suppl 2):. PubMed ID: 19298020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Birmingham Mid-Head Resection hip arthroplasty in a young man with gigantism.
    Murphy MT; Shillington MP; Mogridge DR; Journeaux SF
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):324.e13-6. PubMed ID: 21704481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early results of the Birmingham mid-head resection arthroplasty.
    Sandiford NA; Muirhead-Allwood S; Skinner J; Kabir C
    Surg Technol Int; 2009 Apr; 18():195-200. PubMed ID: 19579205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
    Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup].
    Götze C; Sippel C; Wendt G; Steinbeck J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12695955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Amstutz HC; Thomas BJ; Jinnah R; Kim W; Grogan T; Yale C
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1984 Feb; 66(2):228-41. PubMed ID: 6693450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.