These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17907483)

  • 1. Penetration of radiopaque dental restorative materials using a novel ultrasound imaging system.
    Singh RS; Culjat MO; Cho JC; Neurgaonkar RR; Yoon DC; Grundfest WS; Brown ER; White SN
    Am J Dent; 2007 Aug; 20(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 17907483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of factors associated with cracked teeth.
    Seo DG; Yi YA; Shin SJ; Park JW
    J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 22341061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure.
    Malament KA; Socransky SS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
    Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coronal microleakage of temporary restorations in previously restored teeth with amalgam and composite.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtasli MB; Ozdemir S
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 15986953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A finite element thermal analysis of various dowel and core materials.
    Varghese S; Ariga P; Padmanaban TV; Subramanian R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 22945706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strengths of a porcelain material to different abutment substrates.
    Ferrari M; Mannocci F; Vichi A; Goracci G
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 11203834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of molars with thin-walled prosthetic crowns made of various materials.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A; Langot C
    Dent Mater; 2012 Apr; 28(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 22209573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro fracture resistance of teeth with dentin-bonded ceramic crowns and core build-ups.
    Lang M; McHugh S; Burke FJ
    Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():88A-96A. PubMed ID: 14674507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wear testing of composite, gold, porcelain, and enamel opposing a removable cobalt-chromium partial denture alloy.
    Alarcon JV; Engelmeier RL; Powers JM; Triolo PT
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 19374708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.