BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17907870)

  • 1. Sophisticated approval voting, ignorance priors, and plurality heuristics: a behavioral social choice analysis in a Thurstonian framework.
    Regenwetter M; Ho MH; Tsetlin I
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Oct; 114(4):994-1014. PubMed ID: 17907870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The unexpected empirical consensus among consensus methods.
    Regenwetter M; Kim A; Kantor A; Ho MH
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jul; 18(7):629-35. PubMed ID: 17614872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical study on voting power in participatory forest planning.
    Vainikainen N; Kangas A; Kangas J
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jul; 88(1):173-80. PubMed ID: 17395363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural equation modeling of approval voting data.
    Tsai RC
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):798-808. PubMed ID: 20805603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
    Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does Internet voting make elections less social? Group voting patterns in Estonian e-voting log files (2013-2015).
    Unt T; Solvak M; Vassil K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177864. PubMed ID: 28542348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Issues or Identity? Cognitive Foundations of Voter Choice.
    Jenke L; Huettel SA
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 20(11):794-804. PubMed ID: 27769726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information and strategic voting.
    Tyszler M; Schram A
    Exp Econ; 2016; 19(2):360-381. PubMed ID: 28035189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Voting behavior of elderly people at the time of the elections for the Lower House of the Federal Republic on December 2, 1990].
    Wilbers J
    Z Gerontol; 1991; 24(5):246-50. PubMed ID: 1957537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?
    Friese M; Smith CT; Plischke T; Bluemke M; Nosek BA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e44130. PubMed ID: 22952898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voting systems for environmental decisions.
    Burgman MA; Regan HM; Maguire LA; Colyvan M; Justus J; Martin TG; Rothley K
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):322-32. PubMed ID: 24423154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust decision making in a nonlinear world.
    Dougherty MR; Thomas RP
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Apr; 119(2):321-44. PubMed ID: 22329684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How Communication Can Make Voters Choose Less Well.
    Hahn U; von Sydow M; Merdes C
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Jan; 11(1):194-206. PubMed ID: 30585433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voters and leaders in the mirror of politics: similarity in personality and voting choice in Italy and Spain.
    Vecchione M; González Castro JL; Caprara GV
    Int J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 46(4):259-70. PubMed ID: 22044270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risky choice with heuristics: reply to Birnbaum (2008), Johnson, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, and Willemsen (2008), and Rieger and Wang (2008).
    Brandstätter E; Gigerenzer G; Hertwig R
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):281-90. PubMed ID: 18211205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Tsai CH; Yen NS; Chen AL; Lin WC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148643. PubMed ID: 26886266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cyborg pantocrator: international relations theory from decisionism to rational choice.
    Guilhot N
    J Hist Behav Sci; 2011; 47(3):279-301. PubMed ID: 21732376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: applying a logic of appropriateness.
    Weber JM; Kopelman S; Messick DM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2004; 8(3):281-307. PubMed ID: 15454350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.
    Raccuia L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163872. PubMed ID: 27732617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain indices of disagreement with one's social values predict EU referendum voting behavior.
    Galli G; Sirota M; Materassi M; Zaninotto F; Terry P
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 12(11):1758-1765. PubMed ID: 28981799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.