These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models. Sinharay S Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Weak measurement invariance with respect to unmeasured variables: an implication of strict factorial invariance. Lubke GH; Dolan CV; Kelderman H; Mellenbergh GJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):231-48. PubMed ID: 14633334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-mode analysis of multimode covariance matrices. Kroonenberg PM; Oort FJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):305-35. PubMed ID: 14633338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs. Raykov T; Penev S Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure for dimensionality assessment in multidimensional item response theory. Levy R; Svetina D Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):208-32. PubMed ID: 21492129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A graded response model for measuring person reliability. Ferrando PJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):641-62. PubMed ID: 19159504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Plausible measurement analogies to some psychometric models of test performance. Kyngdon A Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):478-97. PubMed ID: 21973097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attitudes, order and quantity: deterministic and direct probabilistic tests of unidimensional unfolding. Kyngdon A; Richards B J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):1-34. PubMed ID: 17215563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A note on monotone likelihood ratio of the total score variable in unidimensional item response theory. Unlü A Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):179-87. PubMed ID: 17535477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models. Revuelta J Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The recovery of the density scale using a stochastic quasi-realization of additive conjoint measurement. Pelton TW; Bunderson CV J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 12904677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subject-centered scalability: the sine qua non of summated ratings. Drewes DW Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):258-74. PubMed ID: 19719361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods. Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Rasch model, additive conjoint measurement, and new models of probabilistic measurement theory. Karabatsos G J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):389-423. PubMed ID: 12011506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. McGrath RE; Mitchell M; Kim BH; Hough L Psychol Bull; 2010 May; 136(3):450-70. PubMed ID: 20438146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On mean-sigma estimators and bias. Baldwin P Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 22571589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reporting subscores for institutions. Haberman S; Sinharay S; Puhan G Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):79-95. PubMed ID: 17937841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]