These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17908587)

  • 1. Bayesian meta-analysis of Papanicolaou smear accuracy.
    Cong X; Cox DD; Cantor SB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S133-7. PubMed ID: 17908587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with imperfect reference standards.
    Walter SD; Irwig L; Glasziou PP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Oct; 52(10):943-51. PubMed ID: 10513757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference.
    Dahabreh IJ; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Schmid CH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():8-17. PubMed ID: 28063915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Setting the target for a better cervical screening test: characteristics of a cost-effective test for cervical neoplasia screening.
    Myers ER; McCrory DC; Subramanian S; McCall N; Nanda K; Datta S; Matchar DB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):645-52. PubMed ID: 11042294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the accuracy of Pap smears.
    Evans TC
    Postgrad Med; 1997 Sep; 102(3):63. PubMed ID: 9300017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pap smear refined.
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8):1125. PubMed ID: 9268975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis.
    Karnon J; Peters J; Platt J; Chilcott J; McGoogan E; Brewer N
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 May; 8(20):iii, 1-78. PubMed ID: 15147611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian analysis of binary data from an audit of cervical smears.
    Raab GM; Elton RA
    Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(23):2179-89. PubMed ID: 8310188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review.
    Nanda K; McCrory DC; Myers ER; Bastian LA; Hasselblad V; Hickey JD; Matchar DB
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 May; 132(10):810-9. PubMed ID: 10819705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pap smear.
    Mehta V; Vasanth V; Balachandran C
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2009; 75(2):214-6. PubMed ID: 19293526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An epidemiologic study of Papanicolaou smear data at Ain-Shams University hospitals.
    Fahim HI; Faris R; Arab SE; Sammour MB
    J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 1991; 66(1-2):97-111. PubMed ID: 1800628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy.
    Fahey MT; Irwig L; Macaskill P
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Apr; 141(7):680-9. PubMed ID: 7702044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Update on the Papanicolaou smear: new issues for the 1990s.
    Ollayos CW
    Mil Med; 1997 Aug; 162(8):521-3. PubMed ID: 9271901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer.
    Linder J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A methodological framework to distinguish spectrum effects from spectrum biases and to assess diagnostic and screening test accuracy for patient populations: application to the Papanicolaou cervical cancer smear test.
    Elie C; Coste J;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Feb; 8():7. PubMed ID: 18291032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation.
    DeMay RM
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 9111106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
    Macaskill P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interobserver variability of a Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Raab SS; Geisinger KR; Silverman JF; Thomas PA; Stanley MW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Nov; 110(5):653-9. PubMed ID: 9802352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.