BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17909769)

  • 1. The effect of the "rod-and-frame" illusion on grip planning in a sequential object manipulation task.
    Crajé C; van der Kamp J; Steenbergen B
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 185(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 17909769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual information for action planning in left and right congenital hemiparesis.
    Crajé C; van der Kamp J; Steenbergen B
    Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 1261():54-64. PubMed ID: 19401180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A tilted frame deceives the eye and the hand.
    Li W; Matin E; Bertz JW; Matin L
    J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(16):18.1-16. PubMed ID: 19146284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Knoblauch A; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):529-38. PubMed ID: 25370347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How preparation to touch or grasp alters visual size perception.
    Vishton PM; Jones ED; Stevens JA
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():431-5. PubMed ID: 26245648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: not a change in perceived length.
    Biegstraaten M; de Grave DD; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 17146650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choosing between alternative wrist postures: action planning needs perception.
    Dijkerman HC; McIntosh RD; Schindler I; Nijboer TC; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1476-82. PubMed ID: 19114051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes.
    Smeets JB; Brenner E; de Grave DD; Cuijpers RH
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 12410328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of the Uznadze illusion is temporally dynamic in closed-loop but temporally constant in open-loop grasping.
    Uccelli S; Bruno N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jun; 77(6):1238-1249. PubMed ID: 37784227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 21938544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching.
    Glover SR; Dixon P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):560-72. PubMed ID: 11424646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Illusions of force perception: the role of sensori-motor predictions, visual information, and motor errors.
    Diedrichsen J; Verstynen T; Hon A; Zhang Y; Ivry RB
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 97(5):3305-13. PubMed ID: 17344369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual and tactile information about object-curvature control fingertip forces and grasp kinematics in human dexterous manipulation.
    Jenmalm P; Dahlstedt S; Johansson RS
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Dec; 84(6):2984-97. PubMed ID: 11110826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.
    Westwood DA; Goodale MA
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):243-54. PubMed ID: 12858950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motor adaptation to an optical illusion.
    Glover S; Dixon P
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 137(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 11315556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Opposite effects on perception and action induced by the Ponzo illusion.
    Bartelt R; Darling WG
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Oct; 146(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 12355271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.
    Franz VH; Bülthoff HH; Fahle M
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Apr; 149(4):470-7. PubMed ID: 12677327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of an orientation illusion on motor performance and motor imagery.
    Glover S; Dixon P; Castiello U; Rushworth MF
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 166(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16082537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planning to reach for an object changes how the reacher perceives it.
    Vishton PM; Stephens NJ; Nelson LA; Morra SE; Brunick KL; Stevens JA
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Aug; 18(8):713-9. PubMed ID: 17680943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.