164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17909769)
21. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?
Pavani F; Boscagli I; Benvenuti F; Rabuffetti M; Farnè A
Exp Brain Res; 1999 Jul; 127(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 10424418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T
Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP.
Murata A; Gallese V; Luppino G; Kaseda M; Sakata H
J Neurophysiol; 2000 May; 83(5):2580-601. PubMed ID: 10805659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Visual illusions modify object size estimates for prospective action judgements.
Geers L; Pesenti M; Andres M
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():211-221. PubMed ID: 29883576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
Heath M; Rival C; Binsted G
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 15278330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.
van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; de Wit M; Savelsbergh GJ
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):804-12. PubMed ID: 19118565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differential effects of the rod-and-frame illusion on the timing of forearm rotations.
Lommertzen J; van Zuijlen AM; Meulenbroek RG; van Lier R
Motor Control; 2009 Jan; 13(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 19246778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Inverting the planning gradient: adjustment of grasps to late segments of multi-step object manipulations.
Mathew H; Kunde W; Herbort O
Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1397-1409. PubMed ID: 28233050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on children's perception and grasping.
Duemmler T; Franz VH; Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
Exp Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 186(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 18057923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Grasping reveals visual misjudgements of shape.
Cuijpers RH; Brenner E; Smeets JB
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 175(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 16733703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Sander parallelogram illusion dissociates action and perception despite control for the litany of past confounds.
Whitwell RL; Goodale MA; Merritt KE; Enns JT
Cortex; 2018 Jan; 98():163-176. PubMed ID: 29100659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Attenuation of size illusion effect in dual-task conditions.
Katsumata H
Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Oct; 67():102497. PubMed ID: 31326743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.
Gilster R; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Wiesner CD; Ferstl R
Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 16710685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The functional subdivision of the visual brain: Is there a real illusion effect on action? A multi-lab replication study.
Kopiske KK; Bruno N; Hesse C; Schenk T; Franz VH
Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():130-52. PubMed ID: 27156056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Limits of end-state planning.
Hermens F; Kral D; Rosenbaum DA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():148-62. PubMed ID: 24531145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ventral and dorsal stream interactions during the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion: evidence derived from fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.
Plewan T; Weidner R; Eickhoff SB; Fink GR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2015-29. PubMed ID: 22721374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
Dewar MT; Carey DP
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of irrelevant stimulus orientation on visually guided grasping movements.
Wühr P; Elsner B
Behav Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 121(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17469919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Second-order grasp planning reflects sensitivity to inertial factors.
Wagman JB; Abney DH; Rosenbaum DA
Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Feb; 57():451-460. PubMed ID: 29074308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Grasping actions remap peripersonal space.
Brozzoli C; Pavani F; Urquizar C; Cardinali L; Farnè A
Neuroreport; 2009 Jul; 20(10):913-7. PubMed ID: 19512951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
