194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17909817)
21. Comparison of electron beam computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of right ventricular volumes and function.
Elgeti T; Lembcke A; Enzweiler CN; Breitwieser C; Hamm B; Kivelitz DE
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(5):679-85. PubMed ID: 15480045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of the ECG gating method on ventricular volumes and ejection fractions assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Sievers B; Addo M; Kirchberg S; Bakan A; John-Puthenveettil B; Franken U; Trappe HJ
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2005; 7(2):441-6. PubMed ID: 15881527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of (semi-)automatic and manually adjusted measurements of left ventricular function in dual source computed tomography using three different software tools.
de Jonge GJ; van Ooijen PM; Overbosch J; Gueorguieva AL; Janssen-van der Weide MC; Oudkerk M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jul; 27(6):787-94. PubMed ID: 20972707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Left ventricular functional parameters using ECG-gated multidetector spiral CT in comparison with invasive ventriculography].
Heuschmid M; Küttner A; Schröder S; Trebar B; Burgstahler C; Mahnken A; Niethammer M; Trabold T; Kopp AF; Claussen CD
Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1349-54. PubMed ID: 14556103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Evaluation of two "fast" software tools for the measurement of left ventricular volumes in retrospectively ECG-gated multidetector CT of the heart: biplane area-length method and "shape tracking" method].
Begemann PG; Stahmer F; Stork A; Weiss F; Adam G; Lorenz C; von Berg J
Rofo; 2007 Jun; 179(6):572-80. PubMed ID: 17377874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Routine breath-hold gradient echo MRI-derived right ventricular mass, volumes and function: accuracy, reproducibility and coherence study.
Beygui F; Furber A; Delépine S; Helft G; Metzger JP; Geslin P; Le Jeune JJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2004 Dec; 20(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 15856634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance.
Raman SV; Shah M; McCarthy B; Garcia A; Ferketich AK
Am Heart J; 2006 Mar; 151(3):736-44. PubMed ID: 16504643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantification of left ventricular parameters obtained by automated software for 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Akram K; Anderson HD; Voros S
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Nov; 32(6):1154-60. PubMed ID: 19771473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. MR evaluation of left ventricular volumes and function: threshold-based 3D segmentation versus short-axis planimetry.
Nassenstein K; de Greiff A; Hunold P
Invest Radiol; 2009 Oct; 44(10):635-40. PubMed ID: 19724238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation.
Schlosser T; Pagonidis K; Herborn CU; Hunold P; Waltering KU; Lauenstein TC; Barkhausen J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):765-73. PubMed ID: 15728595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantification of left and right ventricular function and myocardial mass: comparison of low-radiation dose 2nd generation dual-source CT and cardiac MRI.
Takx RA; Moscariello A; Schoepf UJ; Barraza JM; Nance JW; Bastarrika G; Das M; Meyer M; Wildberger JE; Schoenberg SO; Fink C; Henzler T
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e598-604. PubMed ID: 21831552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative analysis of cardiac left ventricular variables obtained by MRI at 3 T: a pre- and post-contrast comparison.
Matthew S; Gandy SJ; Nicholas RS; Waugh SA; Crowe EA; Lerski RA; Dunn MH; Houston JG
Br J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1015):e343-7. PubMed ID: 22745212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Assessment of global left ventricular function by 64-slice spiral CT in patients with old myocardial infarction].
Song L; Zhang ZH; Wang YN; Kong LY; Zhou L; Zhang SY; Feng F; Zhang LR; Jin ZY
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2009 Apr; 31(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 19507604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of left ventricular volumes using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT): phantom and human studies.
Hosoi S; Mochizuki T; Miyagawa M; Shen Y; Murase K; Ikezoe J
Radiat Med; 2003; 21(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 12816352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of right ventricular function with multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and analysis of inter- and intraobserver variability.
Müller M; Teige F; Schnapauff D; Hamm B; Dewey M
Eur Radiol; 2009 Feb; 19(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 18704431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard.
Greupner J; Zimmermann E; Grohmann A; Dübel HP; Althoff TF; Borges AC; Rutsch W; Schlattmann P; Hamm B; Dewey M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(21):1897-907. PubMed ID: 22595410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving the reproducibility of MR-derived left ventricular volume and function measurements with a semi-automatic threshold-based segmentation algorithm.
Jaspers K; Freling HG; van Wijk K; Romijn EI; Greuter MJ; Willems TP
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Mar; 29(3):617-23. PubMed ID: 23053857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of global left ventricular function: comparison of cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography with angiocardiography.
Hundt W; Siebert K; Wintersperger BJ; Becker CR; Knez A; Reiser MF; Rubin GD
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 15891510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing the left atrial phasic volume and function with dual-source CT: comparison with 3T MRI.
Wen Z; Zhang Z; Yu W; Fan Z; Du J; Lv B
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():83-92. PubMed ID: 20054713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How much are atrial volumes and ejection fractions assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging influenced by the ECG gating method?
Sievers B; Addo M; Kirchberg S; Bakan A; John-Puthenveettil B; Franken U; Trappe HJ
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2005; 7(3):587-93. PubMed ID: 15959972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
