93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17910010)
1. Comment on 'The partial area under the summary ROC curve'.
Nadarajah S
Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2731-4; author reply 2734-5. PubMed ID: 17910010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests performance: the ROC curve].
Van Meerhaeghe A
Rev Med Brux; 2002 Apr; 23(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 12056064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating diagnostic tests: The area under the ROC curve and the balance of errors.
Hand DJ
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1502-10. PubMed ID: 20087877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [ROC curves in the evaluation of diagnostic tests].
Burgueño MJ; García-Bastos JL; González-Buitrago JM
Med Clin (Barc); 1995 May; 104(17):661-70. PubMed ID: 7623495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Fosgate GT
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1287-8; author reply 1288. PubMed ID: 15765500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
Gengsheng Qin ; Hotilovac L
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 18426855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
Qin G; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A modified sign test for comparing paired ROC curves.
Braun TM; Alonzo TA
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 17925302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases.
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 516():291-334. PubMed ID: 19219590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Area under the ROC curve for a binary diagnostic test.
Desbiens NA
Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(5):421-2. PubMed ID: 11575492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement.
Michener LA; Walsworth MK; Doukas WC; Murphy KP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11):1898-903. PubMed ID: 19887215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semiparametric ROC surfaces for continuous diagnostic tests based on two test measurements.
Wan S; Zhang B
Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2370-83. PubMed ID: 19499550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regression methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test data.
Rutter CM; Gatsonis CA
Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():S48-56; discussion S65-7, S70-1 pas. PubMed ID: 9419705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Letter to the editor.
Rücker G; Schumacher M
Biostatistics; 2009 Oct; 10(4):806-7. PubMed ID: 19581345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
