These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17910138)

  • 1. Research ethics committees: preserving research integrity and the public trust.
    Mullings AM
    West Indian Med J; 2007 Mar; 56(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 17910138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethics approval: a challenge for public health researchers in India.
    Nagaraja SB; Menezes RG; Zachariah R; Wilson N
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2015; 12(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 25920974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current status of the research ethics committees in Thailand.
    Panichkul S; Mahaisavariya P; Morakote N; Condo S; Caengow S; Ketunpanya A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Aug; 94(8):1013-8. PubMed ID: 21863687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Jul; 7(3):38-49. PubMed ID: 22850142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Keeping society from the benchside.
    Evans JH
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Mar; 8(3):14-6; discussion W4-6. PubMed ID: 18570088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readiness of ethics review systems for a changing public health landscape in the WHO African Region.
    Motari M; Ota MO; Kirigia JM
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Dec; 16(1):82. PubMed ID: 26626131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethics committees: we all need research ethics committees.
    Addison GM
    BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7543):730. PubMed ID: 16565144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying and evaluating layers of vulnerability - a way forward.
    Luna F
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 30058768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of respect in human research ethics: a conceptual analysis and a practical guide.
    Pieper IJ; Thomson CJ
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2014; 32(3-4):232-53. PubMed ID: 25743049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public health practice vs public health research: the role of the institutional review board.
    Wedeen RP
    Am J Public Health; 2004 Nov; 94(11):1841; author reply 1841-2. PubMed ID: 15514214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple ethical review in North-South collaborative research: the experience of the Ebola-Tx trial in Guinea.
    De Crop M; Delamou A; Griensven JV; Ravinetto R
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2016; 1(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 26826351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responses to open peer commentaries on "research exceptionalism".
    Hunter D; Wilson J
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):W4-6. PubMed ID: 20694896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smoking cessation in clinical trials and public health studies: a research ethical imperative.
    Kanarek N; Kanarek MS
    Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17(12):983-7. PubMed ID: 17855118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research ethics and ethical review committees in Sri Lanka: a 25 year journey.
    Dissanayake VH; Lanerolle RD; Mendis N
    Ceylon Med J; 2006 Sep; 51(3):110-3. PubMed ID: 17315589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: ethics committees have important roles in research.
    Walsh DA; Hewitt M
    BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7466):623. PubMed ID: 15361452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethics committees: current research ethics forms are an over-reaction that will stifle research.
    Oliver D
    BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7543):730. PubMed ID: 16565145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advancing research ethics systems in Latin America and the Caribbean: a path for other LMICs?
    Neil M; Saenz C
    Lancet Glob Health; 2020 Jan; 8(1):e23-e24. PubMed ID: 31839133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of a data linkage training workshop for research ethics committees.
    Tan KM; Flack FS; Bear NL; Allen JA
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 16():13. PubMed ID: 25888741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How not to argue against mandatory ethics review.
    Hunter D
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):521-4. PubMed ID: 23236085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Broaden scope of review boards to boost public trust.
    Wyzynski D
    Nature; 2023 Dec; 624(7990):42. PubMed ID: 38052898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.