136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17910164)
1. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie detection and the fifth amendment.
Stoller SE; Wolpe PR
Am J Law Med; 2007; 33(2-3):359-75. PubMed ID: 17910164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Neuroscience-based lie detection: the urgent need for regulation.
Greely HT; Illes J
Am J Law Med; 2007; 33(2-3):377-431. PubMed ID: 17910165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: where are we now? An appraisal of Wolpe, Foster and Langleben's "Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promise and perils" five years later.
Hyman SE
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):49-50. PubMed ID: 20945267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Can bad science be good evidence? Neuroscience, lie detection, and beyond.
Schauer F
Cornell Law Rev; 2010 Sep; 95(6):1191-220. PubMed ID: 20939147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards.
Schauer F
Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 14(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 20060772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Picking and Choosing: Inconsistent Use of Neuroscientific Legal Evidence.
Avery JJ
Albany Law Rev; 2018; 81(3):941-74. PubMed ID: 30081436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Knowing sin: making sure good science doesn't go bad.
Greely HT
Cerebrum; 2006 Jun; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 17120373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils.
Wolpe PR; Foster KR; Langleben DD
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):40-8. PubMed ID: 20945266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AMENDMENTS to the constitution.
Am J Med Technol; 1952; 18(5):262-5. PubMed ID: 12996524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Searching the brain: the Fourth Amendment implications of brain-based deception detection devices.
Boire RG
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):62-3; discussion W5. PubMed ID: 16036708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Lure of lie detectors spooks ethicists.
Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7096):918-9. PubMed ID: 16791164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils.
Wolpe PR; Foster KR; Langleben DD
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):39-49. PubMed ID: 16036700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposed amendment to medical staff bylaws.
PA J; 1978; 8(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 10314417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US could ban patents on medical procedures.
Gene-McDaniel C
BMJ; 1996 Apr; 312(7037):997. PubMed ID: 8616391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. NYSNA responds to proposed bylaws amendment.
Hageman PT
Am Nurse; 1978 May; 10(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 247917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The human costs of over-regulation.
Murray DC
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Mar; 19(3):360-2. PubMed ID: 8657598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposed bylaws amendment. Constituent associations--areas of conformity with ANA.
Am Nurse; 1978 Feb; 10(2):1. PubMed ID: 247914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Brain imaging and the Bill of Rights: memory detection technologies and American criminal justice.
Fox D
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):34-6; discussion W1-4. PubMed ID: 18236335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Science in the Supreme Court: round two.
Richards EP; Walter C
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1998; 17(2):124-5. PubMed ID: 9548091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of malpractice litigation on prosthetic heart valve technology.
Robicsek F
J Card Surg; 1989 Jun; 4(2):111-2. PubMed ID: 2519989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
