150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17910165)
1. Neuroscience-based lie detection: the urgent need for regulation.
Greely HT; Illes J
Am J Law Med; 2007; 33(2-3):377-431. PubMed ID: 17910165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can bad science be good evidence? Neuroscience, lie detection, and beyond.
Schauer F
Cornell Law Rev; 2010 Sep; 95(6):1191-220. PubMed ID: 20939147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards.
Schauer F
Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 14(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 20060772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie detection and the fifth amendment.
Stoller SE; Wolpe PR
Am J Law Med; 2007; 33(2-3):359-75. PubMed ID: 17910164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Picking and Choosing: Inconsistent Use of Neuroscientific Legal Evidence.
Avery JJ
Albany Law Rev; 2018; 81(3):941-74. PubMed ID: 30081436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: where are we now? An appraisal of Wolpe, Foster and Langleben's "Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promise and perils" five years later.
Hyman SE
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):49-50. PubMed ID: 20945267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils.
Wolpe PR; Foster KR; Langleben DD
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):39-49. PubMed ID: 16036700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting concealed information using brain-imaging technology.
Bles M; Haynes JD
Neurocase; 2008; 14(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 18569734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lure of lie detectors spooks ethicists.
Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7096):918-9. PubMed ID: 16791164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Detecting deception from neuroimaging signals--a data-driven perspective.
Haynes JD
Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 Apr; 12(4):126-7; author reply 127-8. PubMed ID: 18308617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Knowing sin: making sure good science doesn't go bad.
Greely HT
Cerebrum; 2006 Jun; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 17120373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional neuroimaging and the law: trends and directions for future scholarship.
Tovino SA
Am J Bioeth; 2007 Sep; 7(9):44-56. PubMed ID: 17849344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The regulation of MR neuroimaging research: disentangling the Gordian knot.
Kulynych JJ
Am J Law Med; 2007; 33(2-3):295-317. PubMed ID: 17910161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Neuroimaging as evidence.
Egan EA
Am J Bioeth; 2007 Sep; 7(9):62-3. PubMed ID: 17849348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Duped: can brain scans uncover lies?
Talbot M
New Yorker; 2007 Jul; ():52-61. PubMed ID: 17600971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [fMRI study of deliberate deception].
Kireev MV; Korotkov AD; Medvedev CV
Fiziol Cheloveka; 2012; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 22567835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From Healthcare to Warfare and Reverse: How Should We Regulate Dual-Use Neurotechnology?
Ienca M; Jotterand F; Elger BS
Neuron; 2018 Jan; 97(2):269-274. PubMed ID: 29346750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Brain imaging and the Bill of Rights: memory detection technologies and American criminal justice.
Fox D
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):34-6; discussion W1-4. PubMed ID: 18236335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: application to lie detection.
Davatzikos C; Ruparel K; Fan Y; Shen DG; Acharyya M; Loughead JW; Gur RC; Langleben DD
Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 16169252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurolaw and consciousness detection.
Sinnott-Armstrong WP
Cortex; 2011; 47(10):1246-7. PubMed ID: 21632047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
