BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17910185)

  • 1. How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context?
    Nelson DL; Goodmon LB; Ceo D
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1014-23. PubMed ID: 17910185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How activation, entanglement, and searching a semantic network contribute to event memory.
    Nelson DL; Kitto K; Galea D; McEvoy CL; Bruza PD
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Aug; 41(6):797-819. PubMed ID: 23645391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prior knowledge: the effects of natural category size on memory for implicitly encoded concepts.
    Nelson DL; Bajo MT; McEvoy CL; Schreiber TA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):957-67. PubMed ID: 2528608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disrupting attention: the need for retrieval cues in working memory theories.
    Nelson DL; Goodmon LB
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 12699144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicitly activated memories are associated to general context cues.
    Nelson DL; Goodmon LB; Akirmak U
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1878-91. PubMed ID: 18265605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McKinney VM; Gee NR; Janczura GA
    Psychol Rev; 1998 Apr; 105(2):299-324. PubMed ID: 9577240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Word-fragment cuing: the lexical search hypothesis.
    Nelson DL; Keelean PD; Negrao M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 2524544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.
    Nelson DL; Bennett DJ; Gee NR; Schreiber TA; McKinney VM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 Jul; 19(4):747-64. PubMed ID: 8345322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theoretical implications of extralist probes for directed forgetting.
    Sahakyan L; Goodmon LB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):920-37. PubMed ID: 20565210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spreading activation or spooky action at a distance?
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Pointer L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 12549582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does testing increase spontaneous mediation in learning semantically related paired associates?
    Cho KW; Neely JH; Brennan MK; Vitrano D; Crocco S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1768-1778. PubMed ID: 28394159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are implicitly activated associates selectively activated?
    Nelson DL; McKinney VM; McEvoy CL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 12747498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of implicit memory on explicit recall: set size and word-frequency effects.
    Nelson DL; Xu J
    Psychol Res; 1995; 57(3-4):203-14. PubMed ID: 7753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compound cuing in free recall.
    Lohnas LJ; Kahana MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):12-24. PubMed ID: 23957364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of phonological and semantic cuing on encoding and retrieval processes in adolescent psychosis.
    Doré MC; Caza N; Gingras N; Maziade M; Rouleau N
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jul; 31(5):533-44. PubMed ID: 18773312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Context effects in recall and recognition at various retention intervals.
    Culross RR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1216-8. PubMed ID: 1501990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Part-list cuing and the dynamics of false recall.
    Kimbal DR; Bjork EL; Bjork RA; Smith TA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 18488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cuing effects and associative information in recognition memory.
    Clark SE; Shiffrin RM
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Sep; 20(5):580-98. PubMed ID: 1453975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.