BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17910189)

  • 1. Metamemorial influences in recognition memory: pictorial encoding reduces conjunction errors.
    Lloyd ME
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1067-73. PubMed ID: 17910189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall.
    McCabe DP; Smith AD
    Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):570-83. PubMed ID: 16754242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. False recognition of pictures versus words in Alzheimer's disease: the distinctiveness heuristic.
    Budson AE; Sitarski J; Daffner KR; Schacter DL
    Neuropsychology; 2002 Apr; 16(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 11949708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Production between and within: distinctiveness and the relative magnitude of the production effect.
    Zhou Y; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2021 Feb; 29(2):168-179. PubMed ID: 33427599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduced effects of pictorial distinctiveness on false memory following dynamic visual noise.
    Parker A; Kember T; Dagnall N
    Memory; 2017 Jul; 25(6):845-855. PubMed ID: 27637835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrieval conditions and false recognition: testing the distinctiveness heuristic.
    Schacter DL; Cendan DL; Dodson CS; Clifford ER
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Dec; 8(4):827-33. PubMed ID: 11848606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhancing the production effect in memory.
    Quinlan CK; Taylor TL
    Memory; 2013; 21(8):904-15. PubMed ID: 23384885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A closer look at children's metacognitive skills: The case of the distinctiveness heuristic.
    Geurten M; Meulemans T; Willems S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():130-148. PubMed ID: 29605654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacognition and false recognition in patients with frontal lobe lesions: the distinctiveness heuristic.
    Budson AE; Dodson CS; Vatner JM; Daffner KR; Black PM; Schacter DL
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):860-71. PubMed ID: 15716158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increasing word distinctiveness eliminates the picture superiority effect in recognition: Evidence for the physical-distinctiveness account.
    Ensor TM; Surprenant AM; Neath I
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):182-193. PubMed ID: 30182328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elaborative processing and conjunction errors in recognition memory.
    Arndt J; Jones TC
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jul; 36(5):899-912. PubMed ID: 18630197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The production effect: delineation of a phenomenon.
    MacLeod CM; Gopie N; Hourihan KL; Neary KR; Ozubko JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):671-85. PubMed ID: 20438265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revisiting distinctive processes in memory.
    Cortese MJ; Watson JM; Khanna MM; McCallion M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Jun; 13(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 17048729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When do pictures reduce false memory?
    Smith RE; Hunt RR
    Mem Cognit; 2020 May; 48(4):623-644. PubMed ID: 31808050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing the familiarity of conjunction lures with pictures.
    Lloyd ME
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1609-14. PubMed ID: 23356239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanisms underlying the production effect for singing.
    Quinlan CK; Taylor TL
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Dec; 73(4):254-264. PubMed ID: 31393154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The production effect is consistent over material variations: support for the distinctiveness account.
    MacLeod CM; Ozubko JD; Hourihan KL; Major JC
    Memory; 2022 Sep; 30(8):1000-1007. PubMed ID: 35635318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the basis of the between-group production effect in recognition.
    Taikh A; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 27244360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Context effects of pictures and words in naming objects, reading words, and generating simple phrases.
    Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1764-84. PubMed ID: 16945859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generation and mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm.
    Guntre RW; Bodner GE; Azad T
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 17910191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.