93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17911682)
1. Multiple detection modalities and disease natural history of breast cancer.
Chen TH; Yen AM; Wu GH; Chen LS; Chiu YH
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):78-81. PubMed ID: 17911682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Revised practice guideline 'Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer'].
Zonderland HM; Tuut MK; den Heeten GJ; Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; Rutqers EJ; Westenend PJ; Smit GM; Benraadt J
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2336-9. PubMed ID: 19024064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A stochastic simulation model of U.S. breast cancer mortality trends from 1975 to 2000.
Plevritis SK; Sigal BM; Salzman P; Rosenberg J; Glynn P
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2006; (36):86-95. PubMed ID: 17032898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.
Lee CH; Weinreb JC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 17411555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer screening: clinical, radiologic, and biochemical.
Feldman ED; Oppong BA; Willey SC
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 55(3):662-70. PubMed ID: 22828098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI and mammography surveillance of women at increased risk for breast cancer: recommendations using an evidence-based approach.
Granader EJ; Dwamena B; Carlos RC
Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1590-5. PubMed ID: 19000876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A natural history model of stage progression applied to breast cancer.
Plevritis SK; Salzman P; Sigal BM; Glynn PW
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(3):581-95. PubMed ID: 16598706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Early detection of breast cancer].
Schreer I; Heywang-Köbrunner SH
Gynakologe; 1994 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 8168732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The MISCAN-Fadia continuous tumor growth model for breast cancer.
Tan SY; van Oortmarssen GJ; de Koning HJ; Boer R; Habbema JD
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2006; (36):56-65. PubMed ID: 17032895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of breast MRI in clinical practice.
Brennan M; Spillane A; Houssami N
Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Jul; 38(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 19575070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer: pre- and postoperative imaging for staging.
Hansen NM; Growney A
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2007 Apr; 16(2):447-63. PubMed ID: 17560522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer in augmented women.
Uematsu T
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 18293060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer.
Warner E
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 19(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 18941396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI versus ultrasonography and mammography for preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Wasif N; Garreau J; Terando A; Kirsch D; Mund DF; Giuliano AE
Am Surg; 2009 Oct; 75(10):970-5. PubMed ID: 19886147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: early detection resource allocation.
Yip CH; Smith RA; Anderson BO; Miller AB; Thomas DB; Ang ES; Caffarella RS; Corbex M; Kreps GL; McTiernan A;
Cancer; 2008 Oct; 113(8 Suppl):2244-56. PubMed ID: 18837017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast self-examination: defining a cohort still in need.
Wilke LG; Broadwater G; Rabiner S; Owens E; Yoon S; Ghate S; Scott V; Walsh R; Baker J; Soo MS; Ibarra-Drendall C; Stouder A; Robertson S; Barron A; Seewaldt V
Am J Surg; 2009 Oct; 198(4):575-9. PubMed ID: 19800471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
