These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17911739)

  • 1. A survey of the effects of the full computerized nursing records system on sharing nursing records among health professionals.
    Kurihara Y; Asai N; Ishimoto E; Kawamata S; Nakamura S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):360-3. PubMed ID: 17911739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of integrated electronic medical records and computerized nursing notes on nurses' time spent in documentation.
    Yee T; Needleman J; Pearson M; Parkerton P; Parkerton M; Wolstein J
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Jun; 30(6):287-92. PubMed ID: 22411414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Full implementation of a computerized nursing records system at Kochi Medical School Hospital in Japan.
    Kurihara Y; Kusunose T; Okabayashi Y; Nyu K; Fujikawa K; Miyai C; Okuhara Y
    Comput Nurs; 2001; 19(3):122-9. PubMed ID: 11391884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nurses' experiences of and opinions about using standardised care plans in electronic health records--a questionnaire study.
    Dahm MF; Wadensten B
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2137-45. PubMed ID: 18705735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interdisciplinary collaboration and the electronic medical record.
    Green SD; Thomas JD
    Pediatr Nurs; 2008; 34(3):225-7, 240. PubMed ID: 18649812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shared records: towards collaborative working with families.
    Glasper EA; Holmes CW; Brown KL; Newton J
    Paediatr Nurs; 2006 Feb; 18(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 16518952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nurses' perceptions of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes.
    Kossman SP; Scheidenhelm SL
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2008; 26(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 18317257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptions of impact of electronic health records on nurses' work.
    Kossman SP
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():337-41. PubMed ID: 17102276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time differences in handwritten and computer documentation of nursing assessment.
    Minda S; Brundage DJ
    Comput Nurs; 1994; 12(6):277-9. PubMed ID: 7812894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nursing process documentation--effects on workload and quality when using a computer program and a key word model for nursing documentation.
    Sahlstedt S; Adolfsson H; Ehnfors M; Källström B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 46():330-6. PubMed ID: 10175419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic evaluation of computer-based nursing documentation.
    Ammenwerth E; Kutscha A; Eichstädter R; Haux R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1102-6. PubMed ID: 11604899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emergency Nurse Documentation Improvement Tool.
    Wainwright GA; Stehly CD; Wittmann-Price RA
    J Trauma Nurs; 2008; 15(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 18467943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Introduction of computer-assisted nursing documentation: quality improvement with PIK (Nursing Information and Communication System)].
    Mahler C
    Pflege Z; 2001 Dec; 54(12):877-81. PubMed ID: 12630157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Progress in the electronic medical record--report of experiences: speaking the same language].
    Stender K
    Pflege Z; 2006 Sep; 59(9):582-4. PubMed ID: 17009803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring spiritual care with informatics.
    Burkhart L; Androwich I
    ANS Adv Nurs Sci; 2009; 32(3):200-10. PubMed ID: 19707089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Information technology and medical record routines in hospitals in the health care region 2].
    Jacobsen GM; Stangeland N; Velund TL; Blørstad O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Oct; 119(25):3765-8. PubMed ID: 10574055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the time for nursing activity in a hospital using a full Electronic Medical Record System (EMR).
    Chung EJ; Kim HJ; Park KH; Song YA; Lee BN; Lee MJ; Lee JH; Lee HA; Lim YS; Choi EY; Hwang HY; Lee HS
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():499-502. PubMed ID: 17102307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of nursing records of cardiac-surgery patients based on the nursing process and focusing on nursing outcomes.
    Kim YJ; Park HA
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Dec; 74(11-12):952-9. PubMed ID: 16112896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Nursing classifications and computerized nursing information systems (CNIS): situation and issues].
    Jetté S
    Perspect Infirm; 2007; 4(4):24-8. PubMed ID: 17479547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Nurses attitude toward the manual recording system of medical records].
    dos Santos SR; de Paula AF; Lima JP
    Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2003; 11(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 12733247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.