315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17911835)
1. Ontology-based modeling of clinical practice guidelines: a clinical decision support system for breast cancer follow-up interventions at primary care settings.
Abidi SR; Abidi SS; Hussain S; Shepherd M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):845-9. PubMed ID: 17911835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Patient-centered consultation of "good practice guidelines": OncoDoc, a decision support system for the management of breast cancer patients].
Bouaud J; Séroussi B; Antoine EC; Gozy M; Khayat D; Boisvieux JF
Therapie; 1999; 54(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 10394256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling guidelines for integration into clinical workflow.
Tu SW; Musen MA; Shankar R; Campbell J; Hrabak K; McClay J; Huff SM; McClure R; Parker C; Rocha R; Abarbanel R; Beard N; Glasgow J; Mansfield G; Ram P; Ye Q; Mays E; Weida T; Chute CG; McDonald K; Molu D; Nyman MA; Scheitel S; Solbrig H; Zill DA; Goldstein MK
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):174-8. PubMed ID: 15360798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A before-after study using OncoDoc, a guideline-based decision support-system on breast cancer management: impact upon physician prescribing behaviour.
Bouaud J; Séroussi B; Antoine EC; Zelek L; Spielmann M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):420-4. PubMed ID: 11604774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Executing clinical practice guidelines using the SAGE execution engine.
Ram P; Berg D; Tu S; Mansfield G; Ye Q; Abarbanel R; Beard N
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):251-5. PubMed ID: 15360813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computerization framework for clinical practice guidelines by extending the XML guidelines element model (GEM).
Hashmi Z; Zrimec T; Hopkins A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():638-42. PubMed ID: 19745389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical practice guidelines in cancerology: comparative study of three decision support-systems for breast and prostate cancer in Lorraine french region].
Rios M; Desandes E; Bresson B; Klein I; Lesur A; Boisson F; Demange V; Bey P
Bull Cancer; 2003 Apr; 90(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 12801820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Creating interoperable guidelines: requirements of vocabulary standards in immunization decision support.
Hrabak KM; Campbell JR; Tu SW; McClure R; Weida RT
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):930-4. PubMed ID: 17911852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Encoding a clinical practice guideline using guideline interchange format: a case study of a depression screening and management guideline.
Choi J; Currie LM; Wang D; Bakken S
Int J Med Inform; 2007 Oct; 76 Suppl 2():S302-7. PubMed ID: 17600762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and implementation of the GLIF3 guideline execution engine.
Wang D; Peleg M; Tu SW; Boxwala AA; Ogunyemi O; Zeng Q; Greenes RA; Patel VL; Shortliffe EH
J Biomed Inform; 2004 Oct; 37(5):305-18. PubMed ID: 15488745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Knowledge-Modeling Approach to Integrate Multiple Clinical Practice Guidelines to Provide Evidence-Based Clinical Decision Support for Managing Comorbid Conditions.
Abidi S
J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):193. PubMed ID: 29076113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experiences with the development, implementation and evaluation of automated decision support systems.
de Clercq P; Hasman A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1033-7. PubMed ID: 15360969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EBCPG: A visualized evidence-based clinical practice guideline system.
Yang WW; Chiang IJ
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():465-70. PubMed ID: 17102301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating provider adherence in a trial of a guideline-based decision support system for hypertension.
Chan AS; Coleman RW; Martins SB; Advani A; Musen MA; Bosworth HB; Oddone EZ; Shlipak MG; Hoffman BB; Goldstein MK
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):125-9. PubMed ID: 15360788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guideline development: focus on breast cancer screening in the EsPeR project.
Dufour JC; Giorgi R; Fieschi D; Gouvernet J; Gillois P; Piana L; Degoulet P; Fieschi M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):439-43. PubMed ID: 11604778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using model checking for critiquing based on clinical guidelines.
Groot P; Hommersom A; Lucas PJ; Merk RJ; ten Teije A; van Harmelen F; Serban R
Artif Intell Med; 2009 May; 46(1):19-36. PubMed ID: 18824335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support.
de Clercq PA; Blom JA; Korsten HH; Hasman A
Artif Intell Med; 2004 May; 31(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 15182844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Development of a knowledge-based system for aiding therapeutic decision in breast cancer].
Renaud-Salis JL; Lagarde C; Bonichon F; Avril A; Durand M
Bull Cancer; 1987; 74(3):277-89. PubMed ID: 3620733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic checking of the correctness of clinical guidelines in GLARE.
Terenziani P; Anselma L; Bottrighi A; Giordano L; Montani S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):807-11. PubMed ID: 17911828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How updating textual clinical practice guidelines impacts clinical decision support systems: a case study with bladder cancer management.
Bouaud J; Séroussi B; Brizon A; Culty T; Mentré F; Ravery V
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):829-33. PubMed ID: 17911832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
