848 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17912001)
1. The diagnostic accuracy of in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy compared to dermoscopy of benign and malignant melanocytic lesions: a prospective study.
Langley RG; Walsh N; Sutherland AE; Propperova I; Delaney L; Morris SF; Gallant C
Dermatology; 2007; 215(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 17912001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of a series of congenital melanocytic nevi suggestive of having developed malignant melanoma.
Marghoob AA; Charles CA; Busam KJ; Rajadhyaksha M; Lee G; Clark-Loeser L; Halpern AC
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Nov; 141(11):1401-12. PubMed ID: 16301387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of benign lentigines: comparison to conventional histology and in vivo characteristics of lentigo maligna.
Langley RG; Burton E; Walsh N; Propperova I; Murray SJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 55(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 16781299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Confocal scanning laser microscopy of benign and malignant melanocytic skin lesions in vivo.
Langley RG; Rajadhyaksha M; Dwyer PJ; Sober AJ; Flotte TJ; Anderson RR
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Sep; 45(3):365-76. PubMed ID: 11511832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of common naevi with globular, homogeneous and reticular pattern in dermoscopy.
Ahlgrimm-Siess V; Massone C; Koller S; Fink-Puches R; Richtig E; Wolf I; Gerger A; Hofmann-Wellenhof R
Br J Dermatol; 2008 May; 158(5):1000-7. PubMed ID: 18284380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significance of dermoscopic patterns in detecting malignant melanoma on acral volar skin: results of a multicenter study in Japan.
Saida T; Miyazaki A; Oguchi S; Ishihara Y; Yamazaki Y; Murase S; Yoshikawa S; Tsuchida T; Kawabata Y; Tamaki K
Arch Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 140(10):1233-8. PubMed ID: 15492186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of three dermoscopic algorithmic methods in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic lesions: the importance of light brown structureless areas in differentiating atypical melanocytic nevi from thin melanomas.
Annessi G; Bono R; Sampogna F; Faraggiana T; Abeni D
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 May; 56(5):759-67. PubMed ID: 17316894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effect of dermoscopy on diagnostic accuracy of pigmented skin lesions emphasizing malignant melanoma].
Schein O; Westreich M; Shalom A
Harefuah; 2009 Dec; 148(12):820-3, 855. PubMed ID: 20088434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of pigmented Spitz nevi: comparison of in vivo confocal images with dermoscopy and routine histopathology.
Pellacani G; Cesinaro AM; Grana C; Seidenari S
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 15337979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improvement of malignant/benign ratio in excised melanocytic lesions in the 'dermoscopy era': a retrospective study 1997-2001.
Carli P; De Giorgi V; Crocetti E; Mannone F; Massi D; Chiarugi A; Giannotti B
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Apr; 150(4):687-92. PubMed ID: 15099364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Limitations of dermoscopy in the recognition of melanoma.
Skvara H; Teban L; Fiebiger M; Binder M; Kittler H
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Feb; 141(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 15724011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of clinically amelanotic malignant melanoma and assessment of its margins by in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy.
Busam KJ; Hester K; Charles C; Sachs DL; Antonescu CR; Gonzalez S; Halpern AC
Arch Dermatol; 2001 Jul; 137(7):923-9. PubMed ID: 11453812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dermoscopy of solitary angiokeratomas: a morphological study.
Zaballos P; Daufí C; Puig S; Argenziano G; Moreno-Ramírez D; Cabo H; Marghoob AA; Llambrich A; Zalaudek I; Malvehy J
Arch Dermatol; 2007 Mar; 143(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 17372096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical selection of melanocytic lesions for dermoscopy decreases the identification of suspicious lesions in comparison with dermoscopy without clinical preselection.
Seidenari S; Longo C; Giusti F; Pellacani G
Br J Dermatol; 2006 May; 154(5):873-9. PubMed ID: 16634889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Features of small melanocytic lesions: does small mean benign? A clinical-dermoscopic study.
de Giorgi V; Savarese I; Rossari S; Gori A; Grazzini M; Crocetti E; Sara Longo A; Oranges T; Massi D
Melanoma Res; 2012 Jun; 22(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 22430838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surveillance of patients at high risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma using digital dermoscopy.
Bauer J; Blum A; Strohhäcker U; Garbe C
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Jan; 152(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 15656806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Specific dermoscopy patterns and amplifications of the cyclin D1 gene to define histopathologically unrecognizable early lesions of acral melanoma in situ.
Yamaura M; Takata M; Miyazaki A; Saida T
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Nov; 141(11):1413-8. PubMed ID: 16301388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of dermoscopy with in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of streaks in melanocytic lesions.
Scope A; Gill M; Benveuto-Andrade C; Halpern AC; Gonzalez S; Marghoob AA
Arch Dermatol; 2007 Jun; 143(6):727-34. PubMed ID: 17576938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early acral melanoma in situ: correlation between the parallel ridge pattern on dermoscopy and microscopic features.
Ishihara Y; Saida T; Miyazaki A; Koga H; Taniguchi A; Tsuchida T; Toyama M; Ohara K
Am J Dermatopathol; 2006 Feb; 28(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 16456320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital image analysis for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Development of a highly effective computer algorithm based on analysis of 837 melanocytic lesions.
Blum A; Luedtke H; Ellwanger U; Schwabe R; Rassner G; Garbe C
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1029-38. PubMed ID: 15541081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
