386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17912117)
1. Comparison of treatment outcome and stability between distraction osteogenesis and LeFort I osteotomy in cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia.
Baek SH; Lee JK; Lee JH; Kim MJ; Kim JR
J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 18(5):1209-15. PubMed ID: 17912117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in nongrowing patients.
Kanno T; Mitsugi M; Hosoe M; Sukegawa S; Yamauchi K; Furuki Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1833-46. PubMed ID: 18718390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pharyngeal airway changes associated with maxillary distraction osteogenesis in adult cleft lip and palate patients.
Aksu M; Taner T; Sahin-Veske P; Kocadereli I; Konas E; Mavili ME
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e133-40. PubMed ID: 22260915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skeletal stability after maxillary distraction osteogenesis or conventional Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate: A superimposition-based cephalometric analysis.
Lundberg J; Al-Taai N; Levring Jäghagen E; Ransjö M; Sjöström M
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(2):925-934. PubMed ID: 38363518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of growth on maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate.
Doucet JC; Herlin C; Bigorre M; Bäumler C; Subsol G; Captier G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):836-41. PubMed ID: 23541938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in the adolescent cleft patient: three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of linear and volumetric changes over five years.
Chen PK; Por YC; Liou EJ; Chang FC
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 20536369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxillary movement in distraction osteogenesis using internal devices in cleft palate patients.
Tomita D; Omura S; Ozaki S; Shimazaki K; Fukuyama E; Tohnai I; Torikai K
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Mar; 48(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 20500078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate cases with midface hypoplasia using rigid external distractor: an alternative technique.
Dua G; Navin Kumar A; Roy ID; Roy SK
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):746-51. PubMed ID: 24777017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Soft tissue changes from maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate--a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Chua HD; Cheung LK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1648-58. PubMed ID: 21958662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skeletal and dental stability after maxillary distraction with a rigid external device in adult cleft lip and palate patients.
Aksu M; Saglam-Aydinatay B; Akcan CA; El H; Taner T; Kocadereli I; Tuncbilek G; Mavili ME
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 20116692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term follow-up of large maxillary advancements with distraction osteogenesis in growing and non-growing cleft lip and palate patients.
Meazzini MC; Basile V; Mazzoleni F; Bozzetti A; Brusati R
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jan; 68(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 25287581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities.
Figueroa AA; Polley JW; Friede H; Ko EW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Nov; 114(6):1382-92; discussion 1393-4. PubMed ID: 15509923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longitudinal dento-skeletal changes in UCLP patients following maxillary distraction osteogenesis using RED system.
Suzuki EY; Motohashi N; Ohyama K
J Med Dent Sci; 2004 Mar; 51(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 15137462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of treatment modality for skeletal Class III malocclusion with labioversed upper incisors and/or protrusive maxilla: surgical movement and stability of rotational maxillary setback procedure.
Baek SH; Kim K; Choi JY
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 20(6):2049-54. PubMed ID: 19881370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of treatment outcome in cleft maxillary hypoplasia treated by rigid external distractor: a cephalometric study.
Sahoo N; Desai AP; Jayan B; Gupta V
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 24406568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Velopharyngeal changes after maxillary advancement in cleft patients with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year cephalometric follow-up.
Ko EW; Figueroa AA; Guyette TW; Polley JW; Law WR
J Craniofac Surg; 1999 Jul; 10(4):312-20; discussion 321-2. PubMed ID: 10686880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the Rigid External Distraction Device Alter Maxillary Pitch in Cleft Maxillary Distraction?
Mathews AT; Dammling CW; Waite PD; Kinard BE
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2023 Dec; 60(12):1572-1577. PubMed ID: 35733371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of different osteotomy modalities in maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate.
Yu H; Wang X; Fang B; Shen SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 70(11):2641-7. PubMed ID: 22520568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft tissue profile changes after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis by use of a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year follow-up.
Wen-Ching Ko E; Figueroa AA; Polley JW
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Sep; 58(9):959-69; discussion 969-70. PubMed ID: 10981975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis with 2 different types of distractors.
Choi HY; Hwang CJ; Kim HJ; Yu HS; Cha JY
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May; 23(3):706-11. PubMed ID: 22565878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
