These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17912668)
1. [Application of an amphiphilic bonder in a goat model to increase the femoral cement-bone adhesion in cemented hip arthroplasty]. Müller-Rath R; Wirtz D; Andereya S; Gravius S; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Marx R; Mumme T Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 17912668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [ Improvement of femoral bone-cement adhesion in cemented revision hip arthroplasty by application of an amphiphilic bonder in a dynamic femur expulsion testing in vitro ]. Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Marx R; Mumme T Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Dec; 52(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 18047404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A new method to optimize the adhesion between bone cement and acetabular bone in total hip arthroplasty]. Wirtz DC; Lelgemann B; Jungwirth F; Niethard FU; Marx R Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12695959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amphiphilic bonder improves adhesion at the acrylic bone cement-bone interface of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: in vivo tests in an ovine model. Müller-Rath R; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Gravius S; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Marx R; Mumme T Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Jul; 128(7):701-7. PubMed ID: 17653560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvement of the long-term adhesive strength between bone cement and bone in cemented cup arthroplasty: ex-vivo study. Mumme T; Gravius S; Andereya S; Marx R; Wirtz DC; Müller-Rath R Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Aug; 127(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 17492454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip]. Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses. Ramos A; Simões JA J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants. Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Furnes O; Havelin LI Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 16819671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface coating to improve the metal-cement bonding in cemented femur stems. Mumme T; Marx R; Müller-Rath R; Siebert CH; Wirtz DC Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Aug; 128(8):773-81. PubMed ID: 17909822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters. Digas G Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The significance of the micropores at the stem-cement interface in total hip replacement. Zhang H; Blunt L; Jiang X; Brown L; Barrans S J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2011; 22(7):845-56. PubMed ID: 21144164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany--an update]. Kreutzer J; Schneider M; Schlegel U; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15754232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of results after reimplantation of total hip arthroplasty cemented cup]. Dzupa V; Cech O; Pacovský V; Pazdírek P Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15069860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components]. Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision. Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation]. Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect. Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing. Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]