These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17913926)

  • 1. Evaluation of the inoculation procedure using a 0.25 McFarland standard for the BD Phoenix automated microbiology system.
    Donay JL; Fernandes P; Lagrange PH; Herrmann JL
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 45(12):4088-9. PubMed ID: 17913926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New Vitek 2 colorimetric GN Card for identification of gram-negative nonfermentative bacilli.
    Pincus DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 45(12):4094; author reply 4094-5. PubMed ID: 18056829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of Bruker Biotyper and BD Phoenix systems for identification of bacterial pathogens associated with urinary tract infections.
    Yan Y; Meng S; Bian D; Quinn C; Li H; Stratton CW; Tang YW
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 49(11):3936-9. PubMed ID: 21918029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the BD PHOENIX Automated Microbiology System for direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative rods from positive blood cultures in a three-phase trial.
    Funke G; Funke-Kissling P
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 42(4):1466-70. PubMed ID: 15070990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of VITEK 2, MicroScan, and Phoenix for identification of clinical isolates and reference strains.
    Jin WY; Jang SJ; Lee MJ; Park G; Kim MJ; Kook JK; Kim DM; Moon DS; Park YJ
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 Aug; 70(4):442-7. PubMed ID: 21767700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of automated reading versus visual interpretation with the BBL Crystal enteric/nonfermenter identification system in a clinical setting.
    Lo-Ten-Foe JR; Ververs MA; Buiting AG
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2007 Jun; 26(6):443-4. PubMed ID: 17520304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct comparison of the BD phoenix system with the MicroScan WalkAway system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative organisms.
    Snyder JW; Munier GK; Johnson CL
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 46(7):2327-33. PubMed ID: 18495856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of BD Phoenix AP Workflow with Vitek 2.
    Junkins AD; Arbefeville SS; Howard WJ; Richter SS
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 May; 48(5):1929-31. PubMed ID: 20220158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Biomic V3 microbiology system for identification of selected species on BBL CHROMagar orientation agar and CHROMagar MRSA medium.
    Baron EJ; D'Souza H; Wang AQ; Gibbs DL
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 46(10):3488-90. PubMed ID: 18701661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are bacterial culture quantifications reliable? Comparative performance of the WASP automated inoculation instrument in the era of ISO 15189 accreditation.
    Fihman V; Bleunven SC; Le Glaunec JM; Maillebuau F; De Rochebouet I; Nebbad-Lechani B; Desroches M; Decousser JW
    J Med Microbiol; 2018 Nov; 67(11):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 30307844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transformation From a Conventional Clinical Microbiology Laboratory to Full Automation.
    Moreno-Camacho JL; Calva-Espinosa DY; Leal-Leyva YY; Elizalde-Olivas DC; Campos-Romero A; Alcántar-Fernández J
    Lab Med; 2017 Dec; 49(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 29253199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A genomic day in the life of a clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Long SW; Williams D; Valson C; Cantu CC; Cernoch P; Musser JM; Olsen RJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Apr; 51(4):1272-7. PubMed ID: 23345298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Culture-free club.
    Bryant JM
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2013 Jul; 11(7):434. PubMed ID: 23748338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus vitulinus by the BD phoenix automated microbiology system.
    Cirković I; Hauschild T; Jezek P; Dimitrijević V; Vuković D; Stepanović S
    Curr Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 57(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 18481144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the microbiota of a mixed infection of the tongue using phenotypic and genotypic methods simultaneously and a review of the literature.
    Veloo AC; Schepers RH; Welling GW; Degener JE
    Anaerobe; 2011 Apr; 17(2):47-51. PubMed ID: 21458578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Identification of bacteria].
    Oguri T
    Nihon Rinsho; 2003 Mar; 61 Suppl 3():336-43. PubMed ID: 12717993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A revolution in the identification of pathogens in clinical laboratories.
    Nassif X
    Clin Infect Dis; 2009 Aug; 49(4):552-3. PubMed ID: 19591598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: how much is enough?
    Kootallur BN; Thangavelu CP; Mani M
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2011; 29(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 22120791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Inoculation with the InoqulA and WASP Automated Systems with Manual Inoculation.
    Croxatto A; Dijkstra K; Prod'hom G; Greub G
    J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Jul; 53(7):2298-307. PubMed ID: 25972424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preventing antibiotic resistance through rapid genotypic identification of bacteria and of their antibiotic resistance genes in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Bergeron MG; Ouellette M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 36(8):2169-72. PubMed ID: 9665984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.