These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17914204)

  • 1. Comparing dynamic contour tonometry to Goldmann and hand-held tonometry in normal, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma populations.
    Eichenbaum KD; Mezej M; Eichenbaum JW
    Ann Ophthalmol (Skokie); 2007; 39(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17914204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
    Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.
    Wachtl J; Töteberg-Harms M; Frimmel S; Roos M; Kniestedt C
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 135(6):601-608. PubMed ID: 28494071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Nessim M; Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
    Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry.
    Punjabi OS; Ho HK; Kniestedt C; Bostrom AG; Stamper RL; Lin SC
    Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver agreement using Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry: comparing ophthalmologists, nurses and technicians.
    Kotecha A; Elkarmouty A; Ajtony C; Barton K
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jun; 100(6):854-9. PubMed ID: 26420825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Utility of Diaton Tonometer Measurements in Patients With Ocular Hypertension, Glaucoma, and Glaucoma Tube Shunts: A Preliminary Study for its Potential Use in Keratoprosthesis Patients.
    Risma JM; Tehrani S; Wang K; Fingert JH; Alward WL; Kwon YH
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Aug; 25(8):643-7. PubMed ID: 26950582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry After Vitrectomy.
    Mamas N; Fuest M; Koutsonas A; Roessler G; Mazinani BE; Walter P; Plange N
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Aug; 25(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 26950584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can higher end tonometers be used interchangeably in routine clinical practice?
    Patel KJ; Jain SP; Kapadia PR; Patel NV; Patel S; Patel V
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 64(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 27050348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Dec; 18(9):666-73. PubMed ID: 20010245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude].
    Colás-Tomás T; Prieto-Del Cura M; Villafruela-Güemes I; Clariana-Martín A; Valdivia-Pérez A
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Ledoux A; Pourjavan S
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2007 Mar; 30(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 17417152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of age, central corneal thickness, and quality score on dynamic contour tonometry.
    Jordão ML; Lupinacci AP; Ferreira EL; Enomoto IJ; Costa VP
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Jun; 23(6):1364-9. PubMed ID: 18791544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Lewis SE; Pensyl D; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Grieshaber MC; Schoetzau A; Zawinka C; Flammer J; Orgul S
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 125(6):740-4. PubMed ID: 17562982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
    Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.