BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17914334)

  • 1. Recent advances in breast-specific imaging.
    Berman CG
    Cancer Control; 2007 Oct; 14(4):338-49. PubMed ID: 17914334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advances in breast imaging. Although mammography remains standard for breast cancer screening, several newer technologies are helping to fine-tune diagnosis.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 May; 17(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 20593556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New diagnostic techniques for breast cancer detection.
    Singh V; Saunders C; Wylie L; Bourke A
    Future Oncol; 2008 Aug; 4(4):501-13. PubMed ID: 18684061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
    Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
    Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Malignant lesions on mammography: accuracy of two different computer-aided detection systems.
    Lobbes M; Smidt M; Keymeulen K; Girometti R; Zuiani C; Beets-Tan R; Wildberger J; Boetes C
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 23465980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
    Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Retrospective analysis of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system in full-field digital mammography in correlation to tumor histology].
    Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1103-9. PubMed ID: 16021542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.
    Fenton JJ; Taplin SH; Carney PA; Abraham L; Sickles EA; D'Orsi C; Berns EA; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Barlow WE; Elmore JG
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(14):1399-409. PubMed ID: 17409321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital mammography: an update.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Fuchsjäger M; Wacker T; Hermann KP
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 19592186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
    Freer PE; Winkler N
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection.
    The JS; Schilling KJ; Hoffmeister JW; Friedmann E; McGinnis R; Holcomb RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 19155392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
    Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
    Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Schilling K; Narayanan D; Kalinyak JE; The J; Velasquez MV; Kahn S; Saady M; Mahal R; Chrystal L
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2011 Jan; 38(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 20871992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.