These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17914933)

  • 1. Ecologic studies revisited.
    Wakefield J
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2008; 29():75-90. PubMed ID: 17914933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overcoming ecologic bias using the two-phase study design.
    Wakefield J; Haneuse SJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 167(8):908-16. PubMed ID: 18270370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bias magnification in ecologic studies: a methodological investigation.
    Webster TF
    Environ Health; 2007 Jul; 6():17. PubMed ID: 17615079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ecologic studies in epidemiology: concepts, principles, and methods.
    Morgenstern H
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1995; 16():61-81. PubMed ID: 7639884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Invited commentary: ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples.
    Greenland S; Robins J
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Apr; 139(8):747-60. PubMed ID: 8178788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Divergent biases in ecologic and individual-level studies.
    Greenland S
    Stat Med; 1992 Jun; 11(9):1209-23. PubMed ID: 1509221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution.
    Navidi W; Thomas D; Langholz B; Stram D
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1999 May; (86):1-50; discussion 51-6. PubMed ID: 10465799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The semi-individual study in air pollution epidemiology: a valid design as compared to ecologic studies.
    Künzli N; Tager IB
    Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Oct; 105(10):1078-83. PubMed ID: 9349825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ecologic versus individual-level sources of bias in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects.
    Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 30(6):1343-50. PubMed ID: 11821344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity analyses for ecological regression.
    Wakefield J
    Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 12762436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial analysis of the air pollution-mortality relationship in the context of ecologic confounders.
    Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Willis A; Krewski D; Goldberg MS; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2003 Aug 22-Oct 10; 66(16-19):1735-77. PubMed ID: 12959842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How statistics can be used to promote better health care.
    Sinclair J
    Nurs Times; 1999 Jun 23-29; 95(25):44-6. PubMed ID: 10497591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uses of ecologic studies in the assessment of intended treatment effects.
    Wen SW; Kramer MS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Jan; 52(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 9973068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Space-time clustering of sudden infant death in France from 1981 to 1986].
    Larroque B; Bouvier-Colle MH; Hatton F
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1991; 39(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 2031096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The quality of modern cross-sectional ecologic studies: a bibliometric review.
    Dufault B; Klar N
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 174(10):1101-7. PubMed ID: 21940800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of nondifferential confounder misclassification in ecologic studies.
    Brenner H; Greenland S; Savitz DA
    Epidemiology; 1992 Sep; 3(5):456-9. PubMed ID: 1391140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research: III. Bias analysis via missing-data methods.
    Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 38(6):1662-73. PubMed ID: 19744933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re: Ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples.
    Richardson S; Guihenneuc-Jouyaux C; Lasserre V
    Am J Epidemiol; 1996 Mar; 143(5):522-3. PubMed ID: 8610668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.