These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1791559)

  • 1. Amalgam onlay restoration.
    Doukoudakis S; Doukoudakis A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Oct; 66(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 1791559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Amalgam onlay restoration].
    Doukoudakis S
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 2486357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loss of sound tooth structure when replacing amalgam restorations by adhesive inlays.
    Moscovich H; Creugers NH; De Kanter RJ; Roeters FJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):327-31. PubMed ID: 9855856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preparation modifications for damaged vital posterior teeth.
    Shillingburg HT; Jacobi R; Brackett SE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Apr; 29(2):305-26. PubMed ID: 3888700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A combined porcelain onlay/amalgam restoration for an endodontically treated posterior tooth.
    Fuhrer N; Helft E
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1995; 7(5):13-20; quiz 22. PubMed ID: 7548891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extension for prevention: is it relevant today?
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):189-96. PubMed ID: 10388375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Indications for the use of amalgam and the importance of cavity preparation].
    Riethe P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 6931805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restoration of posterior pulpless teeth: amalgam overlay versus cast gold onlay restoration.
    Liberman R; Judes H; Cohen E; Eli I
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 May; 57(5):540-3. PubMed ID: 3474400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of different metal restorations bonded with resin on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Costa LC; Pegoraro LF; Bonfante G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Apr; 77(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 9104712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pin amalgam restoration and pin amalgam foundation.
    Lambert RL; Goldfogel MH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jul; 54(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 3894628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.
    Vianna ALSV; Prado CJD; Bicalho AA; Pereira RADS; Neves FDD; Soares CJ
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018; 26():e20180004. PubMed ID: 30133672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptation and condensation of amalgam restorations in Class II preparations of conventional and conservative design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 1410252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utilization of ceromer inlays/onlays for replacement of amalgam restorations.
    Koczarski MJ
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 May; 10(4):405-12; quiz 414. PubMed ID: 9655047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance of endodontically prepared teeth using various restorative materials.
    Oliveira Fde C; Denehy GE; Boyer DB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Jul; 115(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 3475370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of preparation designs and adhesive systems on retention of class II amalgam restorations.
    Görücü J; Tiritoglu M; Ozgünaltay G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9297640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A review of concepts of silver amalgam retention.
    Bouschor CF; Martin JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Nov; 36(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 1068289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of different cavity preparation designs on fracture resistance of onlay and overlay restorations using different CAD/CAM materials.
    Ön Salman G; Tacír ƔH; Polat ZS; Salman A
    Am J Dent; 2017 Jun; 30(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 29178763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing the retention and resistance of preparations for cast intracoronal restorations.
    Owen CP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jun; 55(6):674-7. PubMed ID: 3522860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.