243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17917730)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results.
Fujii S; Matsusue E; Kigawa J; Sato S; Kanasaki Y; Nakanishi J; Sugihara S; Kaminou T; Terakawa N; Ogawa T
Eur Radiol; 2008 Feb; 18(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 17917730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones.
Kilickesmez O; Bayramoglu S; Inci E; Cimilli T; Kayhan A
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19235579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the differential diagnosis of uterine endometrial cavity tumors.
Karakas O; Karakas E; Dogan F; Kilicaslan N; Camuzcuoglu A; Incebiyik A; Camuzcuoglu H
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2015 Apr; 127(7-8):266-73. PubMed ID: 25708066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI.
Wang X; Zhao Y; Hu Y; Zhou Y; Ye X; Liu K; Bai G; Guo A; Du M; Jiang L; Wang J; Yan Z
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(28):46390-46397. PubMed ID: 28634318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abnormal uterine cavity: differential diagnosis with MR imaging.
Imaoka I; Sugimura K; Masui T; Takehara Y; Ichijo K; Naito M
Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Dec; 17(10):1445-55. PubMed ID: 10609993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can the apparent diffusion coefficient differentiate the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and the histological subtype of endometrial cancer?
Yan B; Zhao T; Liang X; Niu C; Ding C
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):363-370. PubMed ID: 28696169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The volumetric ADC histogram analysis in differentiating stage IA endometrial carcinoma from endometrial polyp.
Zhao Y; You C; Zhou X; Li X; Zhang C; Wu Y; Shen W
Br J Radiol; 2024 May; 97(1158):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 38662891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating stage IA endometrial carcinoma from normal endometrium and benign diseases of the endometrium: initial study at 3-T magnetic resonance scanner.
Wang J; Yu T; Bai R; Sun H; Zhao X; Li Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 20498531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective Assessment of Histogram-Based Diffusion Metrics for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Endometrial Lesions.
Kierans AS; Doshi AM; Dunst D; Popiolek D; Blank SV; Rosenkrantz AB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 27224233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does diffusion weighted imaging have a prognostic value in differentiating gynecological diseases?
Dogan F; Karakas E; Karakas O; Camuzcuoglu H; Camuzcuoglu A; Kilicaslan N; Guldur ME
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):711-717. PubMed ID: 35490049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Orbital Tumors: Diagnostic Performance of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Based on Region of Interest Selection Method.
Xu XQ; Hu H; Su GY; Liu H; Shi HB; Wu FY
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(5):650-6. PubMed ID: 27587953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps obtained using 3.0T MRI for distinguishing uterine carcinosarcoma from endometrial carcinoma.
Takahashi M; Kozawa E; Tanisaka M; Hasegawa K; Yasuda M; Sakai F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 26605502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of diffusion weighted MRI in the differential diagnosis of endometrial cancer, polyp, hyperplasia, and physiological thickening.
Bakir B; Sanli S; Bakir VL; Ayas S; Yildiz SO; Iyibozkurt AC; Kartal MG; Yavuz E
Clin Imaging; 2017; 41():86-94. PubMed ID: 27829198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer: differentiation from benign endometrial lesions and preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion.
Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K; Nishitani H
Acta Radiol; 2009 Oct; 50(8):947-53. PubMed ID: 19724949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer.
Tamai K; Koyama T; Saga T; Umeoka S; Mikami Y; Fujii S; Togashi K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):682-7. PubMed ID: 17729360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normalized apparent diffusion coefficient: a novel paradigm for characterization of endometrial and subendometrial lesions.
Vora Z; Manchanda S; Sharma R; Das CJ; Hari S; Mathur S; Kumar S; Kachhawa G; Khan MA
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jan; 94(1117):20201069. PubMed ID: 33125267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pathologies of the uterine endometrial cavity: usual and unusual manifestations and pitfalls on magnetic resonance imaging.
Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K; Uehara H; Yoshida S; Nishitani H; Shimazu H
Eur Radiol; 2005 Nov; 15(11):2244-55. PubMed ID: 16228215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Body diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer: is it helpful in the detection of cancer in nonenhanced MR imaging?
Inada Y; Matsuki M; Nakai G; Tatsugami F; Tanikake M; Narabayashi I; Yamada T; Tsuji M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 18182265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of diffusion-weighted MRI in endometrial cancer: a preliminary correlation study with histological grade.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SY; Kim SH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 24316663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion MRI of uterine and ovarian masses: identifying the benign lesions.
Davarpanah AH; Kambadakone A; Holalkere NS; Guimaraes AR; Hahn PF; Lee SI
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Dec; 41(12):2466-2475. PubMed ID: 27660280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
