264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17918032)
1. PhySIC: a veto supertree method with desirable properties.
Ranwez V; Berry V; Criscuolo A; Fabre PH; Guillemot S; Scornavacca C; Douzery EJ
Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):798-817. PubMed ID: 17918032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast computation of supertrees for compatible phylogenies with nested taxa.
Berry V; Semple C
Syst Biol; 2006 Apr; 55(2):270-88. PubMed ID: 16611599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PhySIC_IST: cleaning source trees to infer more informative supertrees.
Scornavacca C; Berry V; Lefort V; Douzery EJ; Ranwez V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():413. PubMed ID: 18834542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amalgamating source trees with different taxonomic levels.
Berry V; Bininda-Emonds OR; Semple C
Syst Biol; 2013 Mar; 62(2):231-49. PubMed ID: 23179602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Constructing rooted supertrees using distances.
Willson SJ
Bull Math Biol; 2004 Nov; 66(6):1755-83. PubMed ID: 15522354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative performance of supertree algorithms in large data sets using the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) as a case study.
Buerki S; Forest F; Salamin N; Alvarez N
Syst Biol; 2011 Jan; 60(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 21068445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.
Eulenstein O; Chen D; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D; Sanderson MJ
Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 15205054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genus-level supertree of Cyprinidae (Actinopterygii: Cypriniformes), partitioned qualitative clade support and test of macro-evolutionary scenarios.
Gaubert P; Denys G; Oberdorff T
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2009 Nov; 84(4):653-89. PubMed ID: 19857213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The shape of supertrees to come: tree shape related properties of fourteen supertree methods.
Wilkinson M; Cotton JA; Creevey C; Eulenstein O; Harris SR; Lapointe FJ; Levasseur C; McInerney JO; Pisani D; Thorley JL
Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 16012108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches.
Baker WJ; Savolainen V; Asmussen-Lange CB; Chase MW; Dransfield J; Forest F; Harley MM; Uhl NW; Wilkinson M
Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):240-56. PubMed ID: 20525581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A fast algorithm to build a supertree with a set of gene trees].
Gorbunov KIu; Liubetskiĭ VA
Mol Biol (Mosk); 2012; 46(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 22642116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supertree algorithms for ancestral divergence dates and nested taxa.
Semple C; Daniel P; Hordijk W; Page RD; Steel M
Bioinformatics; 2004 Oct; 20(15):2355-60. PubMed ID: 15073021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SuperFine: fast and accurate supertree estimation.
Swenson MS; Suri R; Linder CR; Warnow T
Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 21934137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SDM: a fast distance-based approach for (super) tree building in phylogenomics.
Criscuolo A; Berry V; Douzery EJ; Gascuel O
Syst Biol; 2006 Oct; 55(5):740-55. PubMed ID: 17060196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Supertree bootstrapping methods for assessing phylogenetic variation among genes in genome-scale data sets.
Burleigh JG; Driskell AC; Sanderson MJ
Syst Biol; 2006 Jun; 55(3):426-40. PubMed ID: 16861207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel versus unsupported clades: assessing the qualitative support for clades in MRP supertrees.
Bininda-Emonds OR
Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 14668120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Molecular and morphological supertree of stony corals (Anthozoa: Scleractinia) using matrix representation parsimony.
Kerr AM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2005 Nov; 80(4):543-58. PubMed ID: 16221328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Majority-rule supertrees.
Cotton JA; Wilkinson M
Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 17558966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SuperTRI: A new approach based on branch support analyses of multiple independent data sets for assessing reliability of phylogenetic inferences.
Ropiquet A; Li B; Hassanin A
C R Biol; 2009 Sep; 332(9):832-47. PubMed ID: 19748458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multipolar consensus for phylogenetic trees.
Bonnard C; Berry V; Lartillot N
Syst Biol; 2006 Oct; 55(5):837-43. PubMed ID: 17060203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
