264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17918032)
41. Supertree construction in the genomic age.
Bininda-Emonds OR
Methods Enzymol; 2005; 395():745-57. PubMed ID: 15865993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Selecting taxa to save or sequence: desirable criteria and a greedy solution.
Bordewich M; Rodrigo AG; Semple C
Syst Biol; 2008 Dec; 57(6):825-34. PubMed ID: 19085326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. QNet: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks from weighted quartets.
Grünewald S; Forslund K; Dress A; Moulton V
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Feb; 24(2):532-8. PubMed ID: 17119010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Phylogenetic diversity within seconds.
Minh BQ; Klaere S; von Haeseler A
Syst Biol; 2006 Oct; 55(5):769-73. PubMed ID: 17060198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Bad Clade Deletion Supertrees: A Fast and Accurate Supertree Algorithm.
Fleischauer M; Böcker S
Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Sep; 34(9):2408-2421. PubMed ID: 28873954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Summarizing a posterior distribution of trees using agreement subtrees.
Cranston KA; Rannala B
Syst Biol; 2007 Aug; 56(4):578-90. PubMed ID: 17654363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluating intraspecific "network" construction methods using simulated sequence data: do existing algorithms outperform the global maximum parsimony approach?
Cassens I; Mardulyn P; Milinkovitch MC
Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):363-72. PubMed ID: 16012104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Weighted quartets phylogenetics.
Avni E; Cohen R; Snir S
Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):233-42. PubMed ID: 25414175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Triplet supertree heuristics for the tree of life.
Lin HT; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. PubMed ID: 19208181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Reconstructing (super)trees from data sets with missing distances: not all is lost.
Kettleborough G; Dicks J; Roberts IN; Huber KT
Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):1628-42. PubMed ID: 25657329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fixed-parameter tractability of the maximum agreement supertree problem.
Guillemot S; Berry V
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2010; 7(2):342-53. PubMed ID: 20431153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Robinson-Foulds supertrees.
Bansal MS; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D
Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Feb; 5():18. PubMed ID: 20181274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Algorithms for constructing phylogenetic trees of maximum topological similarity].
Iushmanov SV; Chumakov KM
Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol; 1988 Mar; (3):9-15. PubMed ID: 3043212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. On the ancestral compatibility of two phylogenetic trees with nested taxa.
Llabrés M; Rocha J; Rosselló F; Valiente G
J Math Biol; 2006 Sep; 53(3):340-64. PubMed ID: 16823581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Analytic solutions of maximum likelihood on forks of four taxa.
Chor B; Snir S
Math Biosci; 2007 Aug; 208(2):347-58. PubMed ID: 17664091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Maximum likelihood supertrees.
Steel M; Rodrigo A
Syst Biol; 2008 Apr; 57(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 18398769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The supertree tool kit.
Davis KE; Hill J
BMC Res Notes; 2010 Apr; 3():95. PubMed ID: 20377857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Simple but fundamental limitations on supertree and consensus tree methods.
Steel M; Dress AW; Böcker S
Syst Biol; 2000 Jun; 49(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 12118411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Rapid and accurate large-scale coestimation of sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees.
Liu K; Raghavan S; Nelesen S; Linder CR; Warnow T
Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5934):1561-4. PubMed ID: 19541996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Two novel closure rules for constructing phylogenetic super-networks.
Grünewald S; Huber KT; Wu Q
Bull Math Biol; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1906-24. PubMed ID: 18665426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
