205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17918503)
1. The influence of the reference electrode in recording F-waves.
Takahashi N; Otsuka T; Okahashi S; Takahashi O; Takahashi M
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Sep; 47(6):279-83. PubMed ID: 17918503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Normal values of F wave in lower extremities of 73 healthy individuals in Iran.
Alavian-Ghavanini MR; Haghpanah S
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Sep; 40(6):375-9. PubMed ID: 11039122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peroneal F-wave characteristics under submaximal stimulation.
Kong X; Bansal P; Megerian JT; Gozani SN
Neurol Neurophysiol Neurosci; 2006 Jan; ():1. PubMed ID: 17260078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of the reference electrode on CMAP configuration: leg nerve observations and an alternative reference site.
Brashear A; Kincaid JC
Muscle Nerve; 1996 Jan; 19(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8538671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the surface EMG electrode on the compound muscle action potential.
Barkhaus PE; Periquet MI; Nandedkar SD
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006; 46(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 16929630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new method using F-waves to measure muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV).
Metani H; Tsubahara A; Hiraoka T; Aoyagi Y; Tanaka Y
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 45(4):245-53. PubMed ID: 16083149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of F-waves of motor unit action potentials activated during voluntary contraction.
Yamada M
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2004; 44(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15008022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of nerve conduction velocity using surface multielectrode.
Yamada M; Kumagai K; Hirayama M; Uchiyama A
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999; 39(7):415-9. PubMed ID: 10546078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of stimulatory electrode placement on F-wave latency measurements.
Terry GL; Baldwin TM; Morgan SE; Murphy MA; Wainner RS; Clayton RL; Underwood FB
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998; 38(7):411-8. PubMed ID: 9809228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic F wave study in patients suffering from peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
Argyriou AA; Tsolakis I; Papadoulas S; Polychronopoulos P; Gourzis P; Chroni E
Acta Neurol Scand; 2007 Feb; 115(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 17212610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophysiologic response recorded in the first dorsal interosseous muscle with stimulation of the tibial and deep fibular nerves.
Galloway KM; Greathouse DG; Olson R; Tracy M
Clin Anat; 2004 May; 17(4):312-7. PubMed ID: 15108336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Occurrence of A-waves in F-wave studies of healthy nerves.
Puksa L; Stålberg E; Falck B
Muscle Nerve; 2003 Nov; 28(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 14571467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of the reference electrode on the compound muscle action potential of the flexor digiti minimi brevis.
Takahashi N; Robinson LR
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 89(7):570-5. PubMed ID: 20463563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contribution of reference electrode to the compound muscle action potential.
Nandedkar SD; Barkhaus PE
Muscle Nerve; 2007 Jul; 36(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 17455266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The importance of sample size for the estimation of F wave latency parameters in the peroneal nerve.
Chroni E; Taub N; Panayiotopoulos CP
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Oct; 101(5):375-8. PubMed ID: 8913189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stimulation artifact in surface EMG signal: effect of the stimulation waveform, detection system, and current amplitude using hybrid stimulation technique.
Mandrile F; Farina D; Pozzo M; Merletti R
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Dec; 11(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 14960117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tibial nerve F-wave recordings.
Nandedkar SD; Barkhaus PE
Muscle Nerve; 2015 Dec; 52(6):997-1000. PubMed ID: 25847109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility in nerve conduction studies and F-wave analysis.
Pinheiro DS; Manzano GM; Nóbrega JA
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 119(9):2070-3. PubMed ID: 18621579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi.
De Nooij R; Kallenberg LA; Hermens HJ
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):e257-66. PubMed ID: 18556215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of automated and manual F-wave latency measurements.
Fisher MA
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Feb; 116(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 15661103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
