BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17919079)

  • 1. Interactive processing of timbre dimensions: an exploration with event-related potentials.
    Caclin A; McAdams S; Smith BK; Giard MH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 20(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 17919079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactive processing of timbre dimensions: a Garner interference study.
    Caclin A; Giard MH; Smith BK; McAdams S
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1138():159-70. PubMed ID: 17261274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Separate neural processing of timbre dimensions in auditory sensory memory.
    Caclin A; Brattico E; Tervaniemi M; Näätänen R; Morlet D; Giard MH; McAdams S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 18(12):1959-72. PubMed ID: 17129184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occasional changes in sound location enhance middle latency evoked responses.
    Sonnadara RR; Alain C; Trainor LJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):187-92. PubMed ID: 16487494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional origins of the Simon effect: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Melara RD; Wang H; Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():147-59. PubMed ID: 18474363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction?
    Horváth J; Winkler I; Bendixen A
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 18468765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical brain imaging reveals spatio-temporal dynamics of timbre perception in humans.
    Meyer M; Baumann S; Jancke L
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1510-23. PubMed ID: 16798014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
    Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with event-related brain potentials and magnetic fields.
    Degerman A; Rinne T; Särkkä AK; Salmi J; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 27(12):3329-41. PubMed ID: 18598270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emotional salience changes the focus of spatial attention.
    Pauli WM; Röder B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1214():94-104. PubMed ID: 18466885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Familiarity affects environmental sound processing outside the focus of attention: an event-related potential study.
    Kirmse U; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):887-96. PubMed ID: 19345610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gender-specific development of auditory information processing in children: an ERP study.
    Nanova P; Lyamova L; Hadjigeorgieva M; Kolev V; Yordanova J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 119(9):1992-2003. PubMed ID: 18579438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related differences in auditory evoked responses during rapid perceptual learning.
    Alain C; Snyder JS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 119(2):356-66. PubMed ID: 18083619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder.
    Wise V; McFarlane AC; Clark CR; Battersby M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 19607864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of stimulus type and early motherhood on attentional processing.
    Purhonen M; Valkonen-Korhonen M; Lehtonen J
    Dev Psychobiol; 2008 Sep; 50(6):600-7. PubMed ID: 18683182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention.
    Baumann S; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2238-49. PubMed ID: 18457513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic neuromagnetic responses to auditory motion: a novel index for evaluation of attention.
    Xiang J; Holowka S; Ishii R; Wilson D; Chuang S
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():106. PubMed ID: 16012671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Untangling syntactic and sensory processing: an ERP study of music perception.
    Koelsch S; Jentschke S; Sammler D; Mietchen D
    Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):476-90. PubMed ID: 17433099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric specialization during discrimination of sound sources reflected by MMN.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2652-9. PubMed ID: 19500607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.